Author Topic: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild  (Read 181027 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Gnarly4X

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #870 on: May 01, 2017, 06:19:45 PM »
Figure I should post up here since I have a similar new rebuild. Engnbldr Street RV head, 261c and the DT header. Machinist has built plenty of 22REs and said all he needed to do to my rockers was polish them a bit. Did not need to deck the block. Valve lash set to 007/009.

Anyway, I could not be happier with how this motor runs. No issues with idle and starts with a blip of the key cold or hot. It has the quietest idle out of any 22RE I have owned (10 or so at this point) and definitely pulls harder than any of them. I have about 100 miles on it so far. And it does not seem to getting noisier. Like most of us I am super familiar with the valve chatter and this just does not do it for some reason.

I have never had a fresh rebuild though to compare it to. My last truck came to me with a rebuild with 30k on it, stock head, DT and the Comp Cams 252S. My butt dyno says it did not pull as hard as this new motor, although that was 33s/4.88 and my current ride is 35s/5.29. I could not get that previous motor to have a quiet valvetrain.

I'm in CO, so I will be doing emissions on a dyno. I will report back here with how that goes. They can't really test for lean but if I have high NOx that would be a sign.

I haven't read through this whole thread but are you sure your timing mark on the damper is correct? I had that slip on an old motor once and ended up timed 10 degrees ATDC when I thought I was spot on. Caused all sorts of misses and SUPER hot exhaust.

Long story short, unless that 261 is defective I doubt changing cams is going to fix your issues.

andykrow,

Thank you for the fresh breath on 22RE engine building!

My DD software shows me what you are telling me your butt dyno is feeling.  THAT is why I decided on this cam for this engine and rebuild.  BUT... I did have some reservations.

I don't know how the harmonic balancer and the timing mark would slip on the pulley?  When I've checked #1 firing TDC, it's always been right on.

I'm pretty sure my stock exhaust manifold is creating some exhaust restriction and a DT header and 2.25" exhaust would be very noticeable.

My 22s have always had some rocker "tick", but its been the same balanced sound over the entire rocker rack.  And, when I have heard some excessive ticking, I have been able to do a valve lash adjustment and quiet them down to a more normal and even ticking sound.

Did you bore the block?

What sensors did replace, if any?

How many degrees is your total advance ignition timing?

Gnarls.
1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

emsvitil

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 5375
  • Male Posts: 3,363
  • Member since May '07
    • emsvitil's album
    • Buy me a soda
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #871 on: May 01, 2017, 07:04:16 PM »
An exhaust leak can sound like a tap.........
Ed
SoCal
86 SR5 XtraCab
22RE  W56B
31x10.50R15

andykrow

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 67
  • Posts: 143
  • Member since Sep '15
    • Carver Surf Racks
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #872 on: May 01, 2017, 11:04:59 PM »
The harmonic balancer has a layer of rubber that is bonded. At least on the one that this happened to. I think it was just really old and shrunk up a bit. In any case I think the notch on the crank shaft should line up perfectly with the notch on the pulley, iirc.

Engine is bored 20 over. Timing is 5 degrees advanced with the test jumper in place. All sensors checked out so I didn't replace anything there. I had the injectors done by witch hunter but their report indicated I didn't really need to do that.

Truck ran decent before this but she ate up oil like crazy. Pretty much a quart on every full tank of gas! It had a slight miss at idle after getting fully up to temp but that has stopped with the rebuild and the idle doesn't move around like it used to.

Although the motor is quieter I would say it's got a bit more vibration happening at idle. Doesn't bother me though. Kinda expect cams to do that.

I'm honestly a little surprised at the number of people unhappy with the 261. I talked to Ted for a long time before making the purchase, and really became convinced of his knowledge. And I think that combined with torque and HP charts that were posted for a bunch of cams (I think by you Gnarly on Yotatech? Haha) I decided on the 261.

Engine pulls super hard off idle to 4K. I'll probably wait a while before I rev it higher than that, but it certainly wanted to shoot right past 4K. The real test will be the high passes on i70. I have had many different flavors of 22re on that road, doing 60 in 3rd gear at 4K+ rpms, and I know every little steep part between Denver and Moab and how a strong vs weak 22re will handle it.  So far this truck feels like it will climb the fastest out of all of them, which is great cuz it's on 35s :) 3rd gear and 4.2-4.5k on the tach is my happy place for those climbs. I think I'm going to wait till I have a good thousand miles or so before I subject this motor to that kind of torture. But emissions is coming soon.... :maddest:
85 4runner, 22re, 5spd, Ultimate crawler, Alcan lift that is too high, 35s, ARBs.

andykrow

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 67
  • Posts: 143
  • Member since Sep '15
    • Carver Surf Racks
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #873 on: May 01, 2017, 11:20:33 PM »
Not quite done typing for the night, haha. Regarding the manifold, I am going to relay one of Teds suggestions that has worked beautifully on two of my motors and a number of my friends'. 

His recommendation, at least for the sub 5k rpm world we are in, is to keep the stock manifold. It is already basically a header. Then run 2" pipe from the down tube (or whatever it's called that connects to the manifold, still a factory Toyota part), then step up to a 2.25 high flow cat, to a 2.25 magnaflow or other true straight flow muffler.

This is a high flow setup and you get the advantage of that manifold which is QUIET. At least compared to the DT or an LCE that sound like you have little chirping birds under your hood.

On the older motors, that downtube (collector? Idk what the part is called) actually remains two separate tubes for like 2 feet, essentially giving you a tri-y header.

Anyway, if you are going to do a high flow catback, why not weld it up to the stock manifold and see how it goes? Might save yourself $400. Those headers sure do look purdy tho, haha.
85 4runner, 22re, 5spd, Ultimate crawler, Alcan lift that is too high, 35s, ARBs.

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #874 on: May 02, 2017, 04:26:06 AM »
Hey andykrow,

I appreciate you sharing your thoughts and experiences.

Well… what you just described is almost exactly what I’ve experienced as I researched camshafts for the 22 over several years.

I am also somewhat surprised at the feedback on the 261C…. but… I also know there are many difference experiences with these vehicles and especially when it comes to engine rebuilds and power modifications… even the experts have different opinions.

As you probably know, Ted is a NASCAR Gold Wrench award winner.  He’s probably one of sharpest flow guys around.  I definitely respect his opinion.  Lately, I have had more conversations with Tod, his son, but Ted and I had some great back-and-forth on the Pirate site back a few years, and before that on the early Off-road.com site.

LOL… yeah my earlier posts on various cam comparison data is still in the FAQs on several sites….. despite the smack-down I got from skeptics about computer produced dyno data.  It may surprise many skeptics to find out how many serious race-engine builders use Performance Trends software! 

Based on my test data, my earlier choice was the CompCam 252S because at the time it was sold by one of the most reputable camshaft builders on the planet, and was a mild change to the stock cam specs.  I was primarily only looking for a small, but noticeable increase in torque in my target RPM range of 2500 to 3500, while maintaining a reasonable gas mileage.

As Ted at engbldr once confirmed on one of my posts, the results of a SuperFlo 902S tested engine may NOT simulate the same results on the race track as experienced by the driver.

I’ll work on compiling and posting my latest Engine Analyzer comparisons I did on several selected cam profiles specifically with our 2 rebuild specs.

I will figure out what the issues are with my rebuild, its just taking me WAY longer than I anticipated.

The one thing that has always REALLY bothered me is why I cannot get ANY actual dyno (engine or chassis) certified test data on the camshafts being sold for the Toyota 20/22R-RE engines!

On the exhaust... yes this is also something I've read about.  With my first 22RE, the exhaust changes were too big.  The DT header, muffler, cat, and 2.5" tubing caused a very noticeable loss in low end torque.  I had to change the tubing and the muffler.  The 22R responds differently to exhaust changes, in my opinion.

Gnarls.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2017, 04:37:15 AM by Gnarly4X »
1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

andykrow

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 67
  • Posts: 143
  • Member since Sep '15
    • Carver Surf Racks
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #875 on: May 02, 2017, 10:12:40 AM »
Yeah I guess I always go the impression from Ted that he was doing some amount of testing on the dyno, but he wouldn't put up the actual numbers. Only a range of percent of increase. Which I guess makes sense from a business point of view, if you put up dyno numbers you are opening yourself up to every idiot with a truck that runs like crap trying to say your product doesn't run as advertised.

I spent a few years tuning a Wrx and I don't remember any of the mod companies I dealt with putting up real dyno results. They would just make a vague dyno-looking chart without any numbers (totally worthless) and really just say what "stage" you should be at to run that piece of gear. Maybe that has changed but it was Cobb and Turbo XS, pretty big names in the game, and they seemed to have no interest in provided a real chart to the public.

All in all with a 22RE cam, looking at those charts you posted it is apparent that mostly what is happening is shifting the power band one way or another. Peak torque and HP never vary by that much. I would certainly question anyone who can feel the difference between couple of ft/lbs or HP. It looks like the 252 should be a touch better than the 261. And I cant even really compare from when I owned one because now I am running a RV head with oversized valves. If Ted is right and that head provides 6-10% increase than that is far more than a cam change can do. I am a believer in that head, that is for sure :) I can't really see throwing $230 at the 252 to maybe gain 2 ft/lbs, haha.

Did engnbldr have any response to the lobes being off-center? Can't see that causing your engine issues, but it might speak to some QC issues in that production run.
85 4runner, 22re, 5spd, Ultimate crawler, Alcan lift that is too high, 35s, ARBs.

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #876 on: May 03, 2017, 04:41:13 AM »
Hi andykrow,

Great commentary.

On my question about the lobe misalignment on my cam… Tod said that it is not uncommon and that it won’t cause any issues (paraphrased).

I understand all the aspects of sales, marketing, advertising, distribution, and profit-loss in a sales driven business model.  When I first read Ted’s posts on his Toyota 22 power enhancement products, I challenged him and at that time he could not, or would not share any test data… so I, like many, just had to take his expert “word” on the percentages.  As I recall his oversized valves will add about 7% to 8%.

Dyno numbers… over the years, anytime I had a chance to communicate with a supplier, I always asked for data to backup their claims.  So far, I have not seen any.

The Doug Thorley engineer I met and spoke with back around 1987 said the header I was having installed on my 22RE would increase power about 10%, again I asked for test data….crickets.

From 1977 thru 1986 I ran K&N air filters on all 3 of my sandrails….again I asked for their test data on performance gains and long term use… crickets. Here’s a link to their FAQs… read #2.  https://www.knfilters.com/faq.htm#2

It’s my opinion that many advertised power gain numbers are very optimistic, or simply inflated for marketing purposes, and not realistic for the average consumer.

Just my speculation…. If I take my 1985 stock 22R, rated at 96 HP, add a Doug Thorley header and 2.25 exhaust with free-flow and get 8 to 10%, that’s 105.6 HP. Then I add an RV head with over-sized valves, that adds another 7 to 8% - that’s 113 HP. Now install torquey camshaft, that adds 2 to 4%, that totals approximately 116 HP, or an increase of about 20 HP.  Is that reasonable?  I’d love to see an engine dyno test on SuperFlo 902S starting with a factory stock 22R or 22RE and adding a header, a ported head with OS valves, and a torquey cam.

My experience with the 22s is not as long as yours, but my experience is slightly different.  With the modifications I have made on all of my 22s, I could DEFINITELY feel the difference in throttle response, torque, and high end RPM.  I do believe that my butt dyno can, in fact, feel the difference in very small torque number changes.  My 85 factory stock 22R was rated at 96 HP, so small changes to an already under-powered truck was noticeable.

Can you feel the difference when you switch on your AC in your 22RE?  How much in HP or torque numbers is the drag on the engine?

Regarding publically shared product test data and false advertising… why would it not be perfectly legal for a supplier to share test data on a specific engine test with a specific product, with an appropriate disclaimer?

More than one expert Toyota 22 engine builder has told me that the primary restriction to the stock head is the port design.  WITHOUT porting the head - based upon flow bench testing - larger valves, cam profile changes, and opened exhaust will NOT be significant.

How much increase in torque and HP will a $1210 Stage 2 head from 22RE Performance add to my 1986 factory stock 22RE??????.... I don’t know.

Until I see some certified comparison test data, I have to go by the “experts”, Toyota aftermarket suppliers, anecdotal opinions, shared experiences of others, my experiences, and my years of research, and 1000s of hours doing mock pulls on my Engine Analyzer software.

Gnarls.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2017, 04:59:21 AM by Gnarly4X »
1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #877 on: May 03, 2017, 08:00:19 PM »
Hey andykrow,

I have attached an Excel sheet with 4 cams.  For this comparison I simply only changed the cam specs as published by the manufacturer or supplier.

I chose those cams because they closely match my desired power gain in torque in the RPM range I use the most.

These are just predicted numbers from my Engine Analyzer software, so they may or may not be what we would see on an actual engine dynamometer test.

Please compare the numbers for the CompCam 252S and the Schneider 244-50F... interesting numbers?

Based upon those numbers my choice today is the same one I chose about 13 years ago for my 22R… the CompCam 252S.

The engine specs are:  1986 22RE, .020” over bore, 1mm Over-size valves, Compression Ratio 9.6:1, header and free-flow exhaust.

The dyno program running conditions are:  29.82 Barometric pressure, Intake air temperature 80d F, Dew Point 37d F, Elevation 1,000 feet, Coolant Temperature 195, Fuel 87 Octane.

See attached Excel Sheet.

Please let me know what you think.

Gnarls.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2017, 08:07:34 PM by Gnarly4X »
1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

liveoak

  • Offline Crawler Guru
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: 96
  • Posts: 687
  • Member since Mar '08
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #878 on: May 03, 2017, 09:43:44 PM »
This is just my 2 cents but I gave up a long time ago trying to make gains in a 22re because of the rom style engine control map(pre programmed) the early ECUs used. Just think about how basic electronics were in the 80s. if there are engine, intake, or exhaust modifications that alter the way that the engine flows, it will cause the air to fuel ratio to change. Without re-mapping the fuel tables, the performance gains from the modifications will not be realized. I would advise anyone rebuilding a 22re to stick to the stock configuration as much as possible. It does not contain modern technology that allows for learning as in todays ECUs. Carbureted 22r's are much more accepting of mechanical modifications because you are in control of the air/fuel. I don't think you can apply those spreadsheets to an engine that can't compensate for the changes. That's why LCE wants you to cut open your airbox and advance the teeth because it's a rudimentary way of trying to force it to add more fuel by tricking it into thinking it's getting more air which doesn't do anything for WOT. JET used to offer programming of the 22re ECU(with little success) for something like $400 plus you had to ship it to them but I don't think anyone does it anymore
« Last Edit: May 03, 2017, 10:34:22 PM by liveoak »
my 3rz swap. http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=97722.0

Let me start off with a basket of chips

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #879 on: May 04, 2017, 04:46:00 AM »
This is just my 2 cents but ..

Hey Liveoak,

Wow.. there are a lot of thoughts I have on your comments.

Squeezing more power out of any factory ECU controlled engine is a challenge at the very least, but it’s done all time.

I agree that the 22RE ECU is programmed to “control” the power, and limits changes outside of its “control”, and I have already posted my thoughts on this many times.  I have also commented that in my experience the power gain modifications to the 22R are way more noticeable and reasonable.

I also agree that the data from my DD is based on mathematical changes in the physical dimensions of a camshaft profile, and cannot evaluate or analyze the ECU programmed limitations and electronic ranges… which is very obvious to me when using the program.

I also believe that the cost per increase in numbers (Torque and HP) has been well documented in many posts on this subject.  In other words, people have spent several thousand dollars on aftermarket products to modify a 22RE and the results, by butt-dyno, was in many cases, less than expected.

My interest is not to get a neck-snapping increase in power out of 30 year old engine by bolting in a $100 camshaft and bolting on $600 worth of header and exhaust.  My primary interest was just to educate myself more about how this little engine works…. Learning by way of actual hands-on experience.

Regarding WOT (wide open throttle), I understand what that means to an engine.  Since I'm not building a race engine, the WOT response is way less important to me because I would practically only use WOT power in few driving situations.  My original main interest was to see if I could get more torque in the 2500 to 3500 range where I do 95% of my actual drive time.  I believe that even an increase in peak torque from 140 lbs to 150 lbs will be noticeable enough to make my daily driving more enjoyable. Based on the conversations I’ve had with expert Toyota engine builders, the 22RE injectors will only flow enough fuel to a limit of about 125 HP.  If that’s true, I’ll be happy to take my 116 HP engine to 125 HP.

So looking at the big picture, are the suppliers selling camshafts and larger valves to get more power in a 22RE  is just Bravo Sierra … “air-power”?  Would it be rational to speculate that the reason I don’t see any real engine dyno test data to back up claims by the suppliers of aftermarket products is the purported power gains are not factual?  :dunno:

Or are the experiences expressed on many automotive websites just Bravo Sierra?  :dunno:

I agree with your comment…. “I would advise anyone rebuilding a 22re to stick to the stock configuration as much as possible.”  That’s probably good advice.

Where would we be if we didn’t explore the unknown, break the rules, and think outside the box?  :dunno:

Cognitive Dissonance will always be present in the automotive world... and that is what makes it interesting. :thumbs:

Gnarls. :spin:
« Last Edit: May 06, 2017, 04:11:48 AM by Gnarly4X »
1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

liveoak

  • Offline Crawler Guru
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: 96
  • Posts: 687
  • Member since Mar '08
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #880 on: May 04, 2017, 06:20:14 AM »
I agree we should explore the unknown, but also share what we learn from it. I fell down the 22re rabbit hole long ago. You're still an adjustable cam gear, bored throttle body and supra AFM behind where I was when I finally realized it is what it is. I only mentioned WOT because (on a 22re)it's the top end that suffers most from added air mods(big bores, big valves). The closer you get to WOT, the further you get from the pre-programmed fuel parameters. I hope you get your motor running to your satisfaction, I just thought I'd add some lessons learned to anyone reading this who's thinking about jumping into  the hole with us.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2017, 06:25:52 AM by liveoak »
my 3rz swap. http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=97722.0

Let me start off with a basket of chips

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #881 on: May 04, 2017, 06:49:07 AM »
I agree we should explore the unknown, but also share what we learn from it. I fell down the 22re rabbit hole long ago. You're still an adjustable cam gear, bored throttle body and supra AFM behind where I was when I finally realized it is what it is. I only mentioned WOT because (on a 22re)it's the top end that suffers most from added air mods(big bores, big valves). The closer you get to WOT, the further you get from the pre-programmed fuel parameters. I hope you get your motor running to your satisfaction, I just thought I'd add some lessons learned to anyone reading this who's thinking about jumping into  the hole with us.

All information shared is a good thing.

I'm beyond the theoretical "it will work" and the theoretical "it won't work", I'm just trying to verify what "does work" for myself.

It's definitely appears to be a rabbit hole.

Gnarls.
1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

andykrow

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 67
  • Posts: 143
  • Member since Sep '15
    • Carver Surf Racks
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #882 on: May 04, 2017, 08:05:22 AM »
Gnarly,

Thanks for the data! Very interesting. I would say it confirms what I have been thinking regarding the 2 cams as I drive my new motor a bit more. My butt dyno thinks the previous truck may have had a little more oomph right off the line. Only up to 1500 or so, and than this current motor just takes over, probably due to the OS valves.

It is a bit surprising that the 261 is so weak off idle, compared to the others. Mainly because as for drivability in my setup, I can't really ask for anything better than what I have. (Probably because the 35/5.29 combo is a little lower geared than stock.) I barely have to touch the gas starting from a standstill, she does not want to die.

Certainly, it looks like I would be doing even better if I had the 252 in there right now, but the extra $150 or so I would have had to spend makes me okay with my decision right now. (For now, haha.) My main concern is the 3-4.5k range, where the 261 and 252 are nearly identical. This is the high-altitude interstate pass-climbing range. Since my gearing is so low I am not concerned with torque under 2k.

Soo... With your motor... What is your plan for figuring out the issues?
85 4runner, 22re, 5spd, Ultimate crawler, Alcan lift that is too high, 35s, ARBs.

andykrow

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 67
  • Posts: 143
  • Member since Sep '15
    • Carver Surf Racks
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #883 on: May 04, 2017, 08:13:07 AM »
One thing I might note with regards to tuning the 22RE. They are always pretty weak, in my mind. So, one quickly becomes used to the mods that were done and the truck gets back to feeling slow. All I have to do when that happens is hop in one of my friend's toys to remind myself that I have the fastest 22re amongst them. ;)

I don't really know enough about tuning, but there is some sort of range available from the ecu. It is EFI after all, it does look at the mixture and adjust accordingly. So it stands to reason if I can increase flow I will get more power, within the limits of the fuel map and the injectors. Currently I am happy with the OS valves and open exhaust and I will never take that any further.

As for WOT, in this motor that is open loop, correct? So, with too much flow we are going to lean out the motor, possibly dangerously. If one could edit that WOT mapping maybe we could get somewhere.

Personally I nearly always stay out of WOT on these motors, they actually seem to have a bit more power when you are close to WOT but not all the way there.
85 4runner, 22re, 5spd, Ultimate crawler, Alcan lift that is too high, 35s, ARBs.

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #884 on: May 04, 2017, 08:03:28 PM »
..
It is a bit surprising that the 261 is so weak off idle, compared to the others.

This really surprised me also! ??  I've been trying to figure out where the data is getting the numbers...  6 degrees of overlap??

My butt dyno so far says this cam has lots of torque in the lower RPM range? 

Gnarls.


1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #885 on: May 04, 2017, 08:34:22 PM »
..
As for WOT, in this motor that is open loop, correct? So, with too much flow we are going to lean out the motor, possibly dangerously. ..

Yes, WOT for most EFI ECUs will bypass the O2 sensor input, which is only going to read lean or rich - I don't think the O2 sensor in our 22RE is a linear readout.  In open loop, I believe AFR goes rich, not lean.

Gnarls.
1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #886 on: May 04, 2017, 08:44:08 PM »
Gnarly,  Soo... With your motor... What is your plan for figuring out the issues?

Well... I will look at the rockers and cam on Sunday.  I need to figure out what is making the noise I hear.  I am debating to stick in my old stock cam, for testing purposes, or just order the CompCam 252S? 

As much as I hate to pull the chamber and throttle body to get to that dad-gum pressure regulator, I need to replace it to be sure it's not causing a low fuel pressure issue to the injectors... possibly causing what I think is a lean mixture.

Beyond that, I'm overly analyzing my rebuild and wanting to get it sounding right to my ears.  Then get 1000 miles on it.

I'm frustrated with this rebuild, but not surprised at the challenges and speed bumps I have run into.

Knowing what I know now, and could go back in time, I would rethink it and do it differently.

Gnarls

1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

emsvitil

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 5375
  • Male Posts: 3,363
  • Member since May '07
    • emsvitil's album
    • Buy me a soda
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #887 on: May 04, 2017, 08:48:28 PM »
Put a pressure gauge on the fuel system first so you don't have to pull things apart.............

I think   :headscratch: you can tap in on the cold start injector.......
Ed
SoCal
86 SR5 XtraCab
22RE  W56B
31x10.50R15

emsvitil

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 5375
  • Male Posts: 3,363
  • Member since May '07
    • emsvitil's album
    • Buy me a soda
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #888 on: May 04, 2017, 08:51:14 PM »
http://www.lceperformance.com/Fuel-Pressure-Gauge-Kit-22RE-3VZ-EFI-p/2019128.htm

You should be able to do above with a DIY solution........
Ed
SoCal
86 SR5 XtraCab
22RE  W56B
31x10.50R15

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #889 on: May 04, 2017, 08:53:53 PM »
Put a pressure gauge on the fuel system first so you don't have to pull things apart.............

I think   :headscratch: you can tap in on the cold start injector.......

Yeah.... not a bad idea... I've looked at this before:   http://www.lceperformance.com/Fuel-Pressure-Gauge-Kit-22RE-3VZ-EFI-p/2019128.htm

Gnarls.
1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #890 on: May 04, 2017, 08:55:09 PM »
http://www.lceperformance.com/Fuel-Pressure-Gauge-Kit-22RE-3VZ-EFI-p/2019128.htm

You should be able to do above with a DIY solution........

Funny... I was just posting the link after I read your suggestion!!

Gnarls.
1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #891 on: May 04, 2017, 08:56:43 PM »
http://www.lceperformance.com/Fuel-Pressure-Gauge-Kit-22RE-3VZ-EFI-p/2019128.htm

You should be able to do above with a DIY solution........

Geezz.. I've got close to $6,000 invested so far.... so another $60 or $70 seems like peanuts!! :dunno: 

And, if the pressure is OK, I'll have another cool tool to add to my garage!!!  A new fuel pressure regulator is about $70.


Gnarls.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2017, 03:53:33 AM by Gnarly4X »
1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #892 on: May 04, 2017, 09:09:48 PM »
emsvitil,

By testing fuel pressure at the cold start injector, will that confirm that the fuel pressure regulator is functioning properly? :dunno:

Gnarls.
1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

emsvitil

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 5375
  • Male Posts: 3,363
  • Member since May '07
    • emsvitil's album
    • Buy me a soda
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #893 on: May 04, 2017, 09:18:19 PM »
I don't have a diagram at the moment, but I believe all injectors  are before the fuel pressure regulator....

If that's the case.........   Yes.
Ed
SoCal
86 SR5 XtraCab
22RE  W56B
31x10.50R15

emsvitil

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 5375
  • Male Posts: 3,363
  • Member since May '07
    • emsvitil's album
    • Buy me a soda
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #894 on: May 04, 2017, 09:22:25 PM »
I'd go with this:

http://www.lceperformance.com/Fuel-Pressure-Bolt-Kit-22RE-Fuel-rail-p/1093076.htm


and use a existing gauge I have laying around, and a npt plug when I'm done.........
Ed
SoCal
86 SR5 XtraCab
22RE  W56B
31x10.50R15

emsvitil

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 5375
  • Male Posts: 3,363
  • Member since May '07
    • emsvitil's album
    • Buy me a soda
Ed
SoCal
86 SR5 XtraCab
22RE  W56B
31x10.50R15

H8PVMNT

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 451
  • Male Posts: 3,500
  • Member since May '07
  • I'LL NEVER MAKE IT...
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #896 on: May 05, 2017, 03:50:41 AM »
I replaced a fuel pressure regulator on an '85 22re 4runner without removing anything else.  I don't remembering it being easy, but it can be done.
“I would rather wake up in the middle of nowhere than in any city on earth.”
– Steve McQueen

"Except for maybe Seattle."  -H8PVMNT

"I plan to hit 300k in this truck"  :)bestgen4runner

 "I'm jealous of your shop. It has concrete and doesn't smell like pickles like the old shop  "  300K

Gnarly4X [OP]

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 3689
  • Male Posts: 3,016
  • Member since Jun '16
  • Marlin and I slid "The Sluice" Martinez Canyon
    • Buy me some coffee
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #897 on: May 05, 2017, 04:24:54 AM »
I replaced a fuel pressure regulator on an '85 22re 4runner without removing anything else.  I don't remembering it being easy, but it can be done.

Well... I stared at this for about 30 minutes.  I looked at the pressure regulator from every angle, and I cannot see how I can get a wrench on the hex part of the regulator to loosen it and re-tighten it.  Obviously its doable... you did it.  It needs to seat with the fuel rail very carefully and with the right amount of torque so there is no fuel leaks.  An open end wrench looks like the only tool that will work?

If there is a trick to getting to it and R&R'd without removing the chamber and throttle body, I'd like to know what it is.

Gnarls.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2017, 05:33:01 AM by Gnarly4X »
1986 XtraCab SR5 22RE 5speed W56B, ~26,000 MI after break-in, DIM (Did It Myself) rebuilt engine - .020" over, engnbldr RV head, OS valves, 261C cam, DT Header. https://imgur.com/oACTHTR

H8PVMNT

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 451
  • Male Posts: 3,500
  • Member since May '07
  • I'LL NEVER MAKE IT...
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #898 on: May 05, 2017, 09:02:01 AM »
I don't have one to look at anymore, (cough, CARB!, cough, sniff) but I remember using a wrench and hurting my hand a little bit.
“I would rather wake up in the middle of nowhere than in any city on earth.”
– Steve McQueen

"Except for maybe Seattle."  -H8PVMNT

"I plan to hit 300k in this truck"  :)bestgen4runner

 "I'm jealous of your shop. It has concrete and doesn't smell like pickles like the old shop  "  300K

andykrow

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 67
  • Posts: 143
  • Member since Sep '15
    • Carver Surf Racks
Re: Gnarly4X's 22RE Rebuild
« Reply #899 on: May 05, 2017, 09:29:08 AM »
I envy you guys with no emissions test :(
85 4runner, 22re, 5spd, Ultimate crawler, Alcan lift that is too high, 35s, ARBs.

 
 
 
 
 

Related Topics

3 Replies
1939 Views
Last post Dec 13, 2007, 04:08:02 PM
by 84pickup
4 Replies
2118 Views
Last post Feb 23, 2010, 05:57:24 PM
by topkicktech
8 Replies
2410 Views
Last post Jun 22, 2010, 02:37:06 PM
by gtoyonrocks
0 Replies
850 Views
Last post Feb 23, 2012, 03:48:38 AM
by b_sherwood3
9 Replies
1852 Views
Last post Jan 08, 2016, 02:03:22 PM
by emsvitil