For you deucie.. Just in case someone with two brain cells spews male bovine fecal matter on the subject:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/
"Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%)."
"Conclusions:
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally."
Gnarls. ![In The Dark :inthedark:](https://board.marlincrawler.com/Smileys/marlin/inthedark.gif)
I wish you could actually read the papers you are citing. 'Low certainty evidence' says it all.
Read that paper, understand the statistics, and then get back to people.
What you are doing right now is pushing a drug that has horrific side effects, and likely zero efficacy against SARS-Cov2. I really wonder sometimes what is going on in the heads of dingdongs like you that pretend to be experts for everything, but cannot even read and understand a manuscript in a poor medical journal. Did you bother to also read the many papers that suggest that Ivermectin has zero effects, or did you pick the one that fits your preconceived ideas and call what you are doing 'research'?
Usually you are just embarrassing, now you are getting dangerous with your pretension of medical knowledge.