If Alice robs a jewelry store and sells the stolen jewelry to Bob and Dave, Bob still owns stolen jewelry. Legally, it doesn't even matter whether Bob knew the jewelry was stolen or how much Dave bought.
Lewis, Lewis, Lewis!! .....Your “logic” is flawed just like your dumbass posts!
The verb OWN in the context of your illogical sentence infers the noun “OWNERSHIP” and the LEGAL right of possession. Neither Alice, Bob, nor Dave can be an “owner”!
If you truly understand LOGIC, then you would know there are valid rules of inference and demonstration. However, there is no universal agreement as to the exact definition or boundaries of logic.
In textual communications conceptual semantics is almost always at play.
Pathetically, you continue to demonstrate your ignorance.
Gnarls.
