Wow that a cool thread idea yota_krawler!
My only personal experience is to compare 37" original-style MTRs VS 37" biased-ply ROCKERs
37x12.5x15 MTRs (original style) with 10"-wide aluminum wheels (installed and ran with these wheels for one year from 7/2007 - 7/2008)Pros:Great all-around tire.
Good in rocks
Easy to balance
Light weight compared to other tires (weighed 85 pounds with 15x10" aluminum wheels)
Good tire sizing: Measured 36-3/4" tall (mounted & off the rig)
People say the sidewalls are weak but I've never had a problem and I regularly run 3-5 psi beadlocked
Ride great on road
Cons:Not so good in the sand
Average in the snow
Could be better on wet/muddy rocks
37x12.5x15 MTRs (original style) with 8"-wide Allied steel beadlocks (upgraded to beadlocks 7/2008, still running same tires and wheels today)Improvements in the MTR with beadlocks:
- WOW, running 4 psi compared to 7 psi is NIGHT AND DAY DIFFERENCE with the 37" MTR. It is much smoother over rocks and has a lot more traction for Rock Crawling. No comparison.
Improvements in the MTR on 8" wide wheels instead of 10" wide wheels:
- Tire sidewall squat is greatly improved and the tire rides smoother at the same lower air pressure
Disadvantage of the MTR on 8" wide wheels instead of 10" wide wheels:
- The tires seems to ride harder at street pressure (I run 32-34 psi) than they used to with the 10"-wide rims
37x13.5x15 Pitbull ROCKER bias ply on 10"-wide steel wheels (ran for two years, 8/2006 - 6/2008)I never ran the ROCKERs with beadlocks, so I was limited to 6 or 7 psi. Any lower and the stiff sidewalls caused air to burp out. I can only imagine they work better at 4 psi.
Pros:MUUUUCCCCHHHHHH better Rock Crawling traction at 7 psi than MTRs at 7 psi air pressure (this is when I ran 10"-wide aluminum wheels on the MTRs)
Still better Rock Crawling traction at 7 psi than MTRs at 4 psi air pressure (this is with my current 8"-wide Allied steel beadlock wheels on the MTRs)
Perform especially well on wet/muddy rocks
Thick sidewall (if you like this or not)
Cons:Poor tire sizing: Only measured 36-1/3" tall (mounted & off the rig)
Heavy! (weighed 108 pounds with 15x10 steel rims)
They balloon quite a bit, so you'll want to daily drive at low psi (20-25) to prevent wearing the center out, but then you'll make worse gas mileage
Bias ply flat spots, sucks for daily driver, especially in the winter months
Hard as hell to balance. Even when you think you got it balanced, just wait a few months and you'll have to rebalance them
Thick sidewall requires you to really air down to get any sidewall squat
Pics:
ROCKERs look nice and square off the rim...
But they balloon pretty bad on a 10" wide wheel...
Note the dusty/dirty contact section here. This is only at 20 psi. You'd need to daily drive at like 8 psi to get even wear.
Maybe these tires demand 12" wheels?? I never kept them long enough to find out
Tread depth:
37" MTR VS 37" ROCKER height comparison -- NOTE: ROCKER is disadvantaged slightly by the weight of my truck -- use your own judgement here
37" MTR + 10"-wide aluminum wheels VS 37" ROCKER + 10"-wide steel wheels -- NOTE: Difference in type of wheel
Front tire comparison:
Conclusion for Rock CrawlingIf you want a tire sized 36-37 inches, and can settle with "good" Rock Crawling traction, then get 37" MTRs
If you can live with a smaller 35 inch tire, and desire REALLY GREAT Rock Crawling traction, then get 37" ROCKERs
Yes, I said
35 inch 37" ROCKER. It's true: the 37" ROCKER equipped rig will drag its axle housings across rocks that the 37" MTR equipped rig will be able to straddle without contact
Needless to say, if you daily drive your rig, don't get biased ply ROCKERs
Pics with 8"-wide beadlock wheels & 37x12.50x15 MTRs at 4 psi.
The Rock Crawling traction at such low PSI makes an incredible difference and I gladly trade ground clearance for this.
Nice molding around a rock under a load:
Here is an example of nice sidewall flex, this was closer to 3 psi:
Other Indirect tire experience:37x12.50x15 Interco TrXuS MT VS 37x12.50x15 Goodyear MTRs (both using 10"-wide steel wheels)I went on many trails with my friend Bevin who ran these TrXuS MTs, I've borrowed, daily driven for a few weeks, and have taken Bevin's rig on a few trails myself. Here is my external comparison that I experienced between our two rigs.
(Bevin has 37" TrXuS MT - 1984 3RZ-powered shortbed, I have 37" MTR - 1981 3RZ-powered shortbed)
Perceived equivalencies between the 37" TrXuS and 37" MTR:TrXuS are sized good (appeared to be as tall as my 37" MTRs)
Equivalent in Rock Crawling performance
Light weight similar to the MTRs
Flexible sidewall similar to the MTRs (MUCH more flexible sidewall than Interco TSLs, also seems slightly more flexible than Interco IROKs)
Perceived advantages of the 37" TrXuS over the 37" MTR:BLOWS THE MTR AWAY in the sand AND snow. MUCH better. I believe this is attributed to the side wall design, that, once deflated, creates a much wider footprint in comparison to the MTR.
MUCH BETTER sidewall design that gives a wide footprint when aired down, and "disappears" when aired up
Quieter on road
Wears as good or maybe better than MTR
Better handling on mountain roads
Perceived disadvantages of the 37" TrXuS vs the 37" MTR:I did not experience any.
Conclusion:In my opinion, the 37" TrXuS MT is every bit comparable to the 37" MTR, yet has a few points where it out performs the MTR. Therefore, I plan to replace my MTRs with these 37" TrXuS MT tires once my MTRs wear out.
Random internet pics of the TrXuS MTs
Ha, I forgot about this: I ran Bevin's tires on my truck for about a week while I was installing bead locks on my MTRs:
(This is from May 20, 2008)