Author Topic: Good enough for photo stock?  (Read 10309 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Cheesemaker

  • Rock Ninja
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 1363
  • Male Posts: 4,525
  • Member since Sep '04
  • Dean Tyler, you were an inspiration to all!!
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #30 on: Jun 03, 2005, 10:17:56 AM »
Sorry, I didn't realize the bridge was in b&w!  That's what happens when you are a photographer, you past the b&w colors and you look at the texture, shadowing, and the depth.  I love to look at b&w of older faces, especially native americans.  The last one you posted was incredible.  :bowdown:  I can't wait til I get down there to that part of Cali.  I'm from Tillamook, OR.  And Dean @ marlincrawler is married to my wifes cousin and he wants to get us down there really bad.  When we go, the first thing packed will be the equipment! 
Miss ya Dean (4THEWKN) & Kyle (KYOTA)!!

4THEWKN~9/17/2006  If it wasn't for you, I'd be driving something other than a Toyota!

My build up ~ project Kilchis! http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=32961.0
Zak's truck build ~ http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=64319.0;topicseen

MiniSimp [OP]

  • Outdoor Enthusiast
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Male Posts: 5,120
  • Member since Jan '05
  • SimpsonBrothers.net
    • View Profile
    • Simpson Brothers Photography
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #31 on: Jun 03, 2005, 10:22:58 AM »
Just bring extra!!!
Here's another B&W for ya...

mudguts

  • Offline The 1K Club
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 1114
  • Posts: 1,158
  • Member since Mar '04
  • Meat of the Gods
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #32 on: Jun 04, 2005, 07:36:57 PM »
I got a little diizzy looking at them (weeds growing from the sky  :conf: ) but they look killer.



 
Quote
awwww, to much water, to many birds, too many trees, the moiuntian was to big, the sea gul was to close,  the duck has bad breath,
the seagul would have been better if he was on a freashly waxed car (bmx, jag,rols ect.) I think "mirror lake " would have looked better at night,awwww I'll think of more.
  :hahaha:  :joke:  :talkingn: Thanks bf  :clap2: 
:nerv:                                                                                               :turtle: I love T.I.T.S. :turtle:

MiniSimp [OP]

  • Outdoor Enthusiast
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Male Posts: 5,120
  • Member since Jan '05
  • SimpsonBrothers.net
    • View Profile
    • Simpson Brothers Photography
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #33 on: Aug 04, 2005, 03:19:01 PM »
Click the thumb for a larger image and tell me what you think! :dunno:




Lady Di

  • Goddess of Mud
  • Rock Ninja
  • Offline Rock Master
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Female Posts: 299
  • Member since Nov '04
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #34 on: Aug 04, 2005, 05:14:57 PM »
Click the thumb for a larger image and tell me what you think! :dunno:

I ain't clickin' on any pregger belly thumbs, ICK! Sorry, you wanted opinions. I don't find it a beautiful thing. ICK!

And btw - I didn't realize the lake pic was upside down. I didn't dislike the foliage in the foreground, like Mike said, it gives great perspective, there was just too much of it. I liked the right side up pic.

but NO PREGNANT BELLYS!
Life is like a bowl of beer flavored chocolate covered dog turds.. it makes no sense. :pokinit:

Where is the Mammoth?

How the Mammoth came to be

Number Two :pokinit:

Lady Di

  • Goddess of Mud
  • Rock Ninja
  • Offline Rock Master
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Female Posts: 299
  • Member since Nov '04
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #35 on: Aug 04, 2005, 05:18:18 PM »
Just bring extra!!!
Here's another B&W for ya...
this one is very cool! Very happy face. Who is it?
Life is like a bowl of beer flavored chocolate covered dog turds.. it makes no sense. :pokinit:

Where is the Mammoth?

How the Mammoth came to be

Number Two :pokinit:

MiniSimp [OP]

  • Outdoor Enthusiast
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Male Posts: 5,120
  • Member since Jan '05
  • SimpsonBrothers.net
    • View Profile
    • Simpson Brothers Photography
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #36 on: Aug 04, 2005, 05:30:07 PM »
this one is very cool! Very happy face. Who is it?
My mom.

Marketing

  • Offline The 1.5K Club
  • **
  • Turtle Points: -30
  • Male Posts: 1,639
  • Member since Aug '03
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #37 on: Aug 05, 2005, 09:56:44 PM »
Wow there are some great photos in this thread!!

I really like the action bird shot on the first page.

I've been shooting with a D70 for about a year now and have just upwards of 40,000 photos with it. Here are a few of my favoite non wheeling photos...






MiniSimp [OP]

  • Outdoor Enthusiast
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Male Posts: 5,120
  • Member since Jan '05
  • SimpsonBrothers.net
    • View Profile
    • Simpson Brothers Photography
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #38 on: Aug 05, 2005, 10:10:57 PM »
Wow there are some great photos in this thread!!
I really like the action bird shot on the first page.
Thanks Chris, BTW, Where is this? I love the colors!


KYOTA

  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 1759
  • Posts: 4,824
  • Member since Jan '04
  • Wreckin Ball '09
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #39 on: Aug 05, 2005, 10:13:27 PM »
Fordyce and Meadow Lake from last year

Marketing

  • Offline The 1.5K Club
  • **
  • Turtle Points: -30
  • Male Posts: 1,639
  • Member since Aug '03
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #40 on: Aug 05, 2005, 10:48:32 PM »
The ocean photo was taken on the southern end of Maui last year.

bigdaddypoppop

  • Offline Rock Crawl'n
  • **
  • Turtle Points: -147
  • Male Posts: 16
  • Member since Jun '05
  • America love it or leave it!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #41 on: Aug 06, 2005, 11:38:20 AM »
Nice photos....Will have to check My list and see what I have from Alaska.

Lady Di

  • Goddess of Mud
  • Rock Ninja
  • Offline Rock Master
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Female Posts: 299
  • Member since Nov '04
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #42 on: Aug 06, 2005, 12:08:25 PM »
Chris, I love the pic of the carshow gal, it is very casual. Here's a few I have taken. I don't that they compare to you guys but I like em.

Life is like a bowl of beer flavored chocolate covered dog turds.. it makes no sense. :pokinit:

Where is the Mammoth?

How the Mammoth came to be

Number Two :pokinit:

MiniSimp [OP]

  • Outdoor Enthusiast
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Male Posts: 5,120
  • Member since Jan '05
  • SimpsonBrothers.net
    • View Profile
    • Simpson Brothers Photography
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #43 on: Aug 06, 2005, 11:31:55 PM »
WTF?????


wa4x4

  • Offline The 1.5K Club
  • **
  • Turtle Points: -310
  • Male Posts: 1,569
  • Member since Jul '05
  • I'm about to tear the curb up
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #44 on: Aug 07, 2005, 01:28:03 AM »
My mom climbed el capitan when she was i think 49. Thats a cool picture.
2007 Satin white pearl STi- mostly stock
2006 WRX TR 320whp 343wtq, taken in a road rage wreck
1998 4runner, needs to become wheeler status

MiniSimp [OP]

  • Outdoor Enthusiast
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Male Posts: 5,120
  • Member since Jan '05
  • SimpsonBrothers.net
    • View Profile
    • Simpson Brothers Photography
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #45 on: Aug 07, 2005, 09:28:47 PM »


crawlerdan

  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 1319
  • Male Posts: 4,770
  • Member since Feb '05
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #46 on: Aug 07, 2005, 09:33:42 PM »
soooo, mini, can you enlarge photos to frame them on a wall or something like that?

Skinny_Pedal

  • Offline The 2.5K Group
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: 89
  • Male Posts: 2,833
  • Member since Apr '04
  • work so I can support my lifestyle
    • View Profile
    • Buy me a beer
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #47 on: Aug 07, 2005, 09:41:30 PM »
my buddy moe. his senior pic
Im an OG

MiniSimp [OP]

  • Outdoor Enthusiast
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Male Posts: 5,120
  • Member since Jan '05
  • SimpsonBrothers.net
    • View Profile
    • Simpson Brothers Photography
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #48 on: Aug 07, 2005, 10:12:01 PM »
soooo, mini, can you enlarge photos to frame them on a wall or something like that?

If you have the negative, yes.

CTENG in KS

  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: -501
  • Male Posts: 4,295
  • Member since Jun '04
  • ^Alfred the Great
    • View Profile
    • CTENG's Eco-Rant
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #49 on: Aug 08, 2005, 10:06:51 AM »
Mrs. Willy showing off the Orlando skyline...sniff sniff, now I wanna come visit the sunhine state.   :-\\
IFS is best kept at ambient temperature in a pile of scrap in the backyard.  When kept under a functioning vehicle, it tends to greatly diminish said vehicle's offroad ability.     -reklund5

4Runner: http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=4580.0
Beastmaster: http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=34339.0

OffRoadGal

  • Offline Crawler Guru
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: -30
  • Female Posts: 419
  • Member since Jan '05
  • you feelin lucky, punk?
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #50 on: Aug 08, 2005, 01:00:11 PM »
WTF?????


:rofl2: Amphicars on the Dora Canals. Mark and the guy driving/owner, Dieter, restored that one.

http://www.mhdfl.com/Pages/Amphi%20Car.htm

The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth.

 :cheer:

OffRoadGal

  • Offline Crawler Guru
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: -30
  • Female Posts: 419
  • Member since Jan '05
  • you feelin lucky, punk?
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #51 on: Aug 08, 2005, 01:02:14 PM »
my buddy moe. his senior pic
I like this picture SP.

The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth.

 :cheer:

gonzo

  • Offline Crawler Guru
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: 2000
  • Male Posts: 734
  • Member since Jan '05
  • Climb Baby Climb!
    • View Profile
    • My 8E6 runner
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #52 on: Aug 14, 2005, 11:30:41 AM »
Very nice pics.   :thumbs:

silver_truck

  • Offline Rock Crawl'n
  • **
  • Turtle Points: 44
  • Posts: 45
  • Member since Jun '05
  • Crawling with Marlin
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #53 on: Aug 15, 2005, 04:21:21 PM »
Those are really good...I'll have to throw a couple of mine in here when I get em on the comp, I shoot with a Nikon N80 with a variety of lenses. The one of the duck is cool but like it was said earlier there needs to more differentiation between the head and body. I like the lake reflection one but like was said before the one weed thing thats right in the middle kinda bugs me, if that wasn't there then it would be perfect, I like the grasses just not the solo big weed. also is that a reflection of the Orange County Choppers logo in the lake in this one:

MiniSimp [OP]

  • Outdoor Enthusiast
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Male Posts: 5,120
  • Member since Jan '05
  • SimpsonBrothers.net
    • View Profile
    • Simpson Brothers Photography
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #54 on: Mar 16, 2006, 01:15:45 PM »
Well, I got in!
Here is some of what they are selling for me...

« Last Edit: Mar 16, 2006, 01:53:28 PM by MiniSimp »

Cheesemaker

  • Rock Ninja
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 1363
  • Male Posts: 4,525
  • Member since Sep '04
  • Dean Tyler, you were an inspiration to all!!
    • View Profile
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #55 on: Mar 17, 2006, 11:47:11 AM »
Hey Mini, what type of programs are you running for picture editing?  Just got a new computer and picked up abode photoshop elements 4.0, and we use the free picasso.  Is there anything else you would recommend program wise?  And what type of printer do ya use?  I'm looking towards a canon printer. 
Miss ya Dean (4THEWKN) & Kyle (KYOTA)!!

4THEWKN~9/17/2006  If it wasn't for you, I'd be driving something other than a Toyota!

My build up ~ project Kilchis! http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=32961.0
Zak's truck build ~ http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=64319.0;topicseen

MiniSimp [OP]

  • Outdoor Enthusiast
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Male Posts: 5,120
  • Member since Jan '05
  • SimpsonBrothers.net
    • View Profile
    • Simpson Brothers Photography
Re: Good enough for photo stock?
« Reply #56 on: Mar 17, 2006, 11:52:32 AM »
For editing I'm using Adobe Photoshop CS2
For printing I will be using Canon PIXMA Pro9000
Now I have a regular Canon photo printer.

I hate having 2 expensive hobbies, but love them both! :yesnod:
« Last Edit: Mar 17, 2006, 01:13:29 PM by MiniSimp »

 
 
 
 
 

Related Topics

8 Replies
4909 Views
Last post Oct 20, 2004, 10:59:57 PM
by Rockrawler
11 Replies
2771 Views
Last post Oct 22, 2004, 09:17:40 PM
by BLACKDOG
7 Replies
3026 Views
Last post Jul 23, 2005, 02:29:52 PM
by BIG BALLS
14 Replies
1908 Views
Last post Apr 18, 2008, 06:24:30 AM
by 86moneypit
21 Replies
2595 Views
Last post Jan 05, 2011, 10:54:37 AM
by muddytaco