Author Topic: CA Prop 63....... Unfair burden.  (Read 908 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

emsvitil

  • Offline Silver Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 7571
  • Male Posts: 3,561
  • Member since May '07
    • View Profile
    • emsvitil's album
    • Buy me a soda
CA Prop 63....... Unfair burden.
« on: Nov 09, 2016, 03:45:48 PM »
If requiring an ID for voting is an unfair burden for poor people and minorities,


Wouldn't requiring an ID,  and a purchasing permit ($50, 4 years) be even MORE of an unfair burden for poor people and minorities?
Ed
SoCal
86 SR5 XtraCab
22RE  W56B
31x10.50R15

Snowtoy

  • Offline The 2.5K Group
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: 1403
  • Male Posts: 2,583
  • Member since Sep '03
    • View Profile
Re: CA Prop 63....... Unfair burden.
« Reply #1 on: Nov 09, 2016, 04:10:48 PM »
Correct, that should be one of the challenges against it, plenty of 1st Amend case law to use, from both voting and anti-abortion cases. 

That is the one thing I don't understand about the gun lobby, since '08 the 2nd has been deemed an individual right, the expression of such is a 1st Amend., all ant-gun legislation should be challenged on 1st Amend grounds, if they do, they should all fall.  All that has to be done, is replace "gun" w/abortion or voting, and the laws should be found as unconstitutional.
'90 black X-cab mod'd 3.0, 33's/4.88's, rear ARB, custom bumpers, sliders, safari rack, etc.
'91 Blue X-cab 22re, 35's/5.29's,Truetrac front, ARB rear, dual cases, and custom Safari flatbed, bumper, interior.
The money pit '87 Supra resto/mod

 
 
 
 
 

Related Topics

2 Replies
1495 Views
Last post Feb 15, 2005, 05:38:13 PM
by RUGER
43 Replies
13419 Views
Last post Nov 09, 2008, 08:30:40 PM
by Hammerhead
87 Replies
10755 Views
Last post Aug 12, 2010, 07:06:28 AM
by brainlessfool
87 Replies
10041 Views
Last post Nov 06, 2010, 12:45:57 AM
by fade