Best 37" tire?

Started by Mike D, October 10, 2004, 09:15:13 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Best 37" tire

MT/R
11 (57.9%)
BFG Krawlers
3 (15.8%)
PRO comp X-Terrians
1 (5.3%)
Baja Claw
0 (0%)
36" TSL/SX
4 (21.1%)

Total Members Voted: 19

Mike D

I decieded that the 38.5" TSL/SX tires would be a little to big for rock crawling. Now i just need some help decieding what would be the best. right now i am running the 33" TSL/SX and they had way more traction then the 35" bfg and pro comp muds. I haven't wheeled with any body who has mt/r's but i have heard they are like a slick in the mud. :dunno:
87 runner, 4" trailmaster lift, 33" TSL/SX, 5.29's V6 e-locker, 22re that cost too much

psychotoy

My 37" boggers are pretty good on the rocks at about 4psi, and really good in the mud, as far as rocks go, I can't really say I've been in a position where I thought they cost me from making any obstacle, although people trash boggers, I like them
"Yeah, I remember stompin' my feet in Eddie's couch"
-Rick James-

iNfErNaL

I agree with you psycho,boggers are the shiiaat.I love mine(4th set)but a lot of people say they suck on rocks(haters I guess)and I've had mine on rocks plenty of times.
WWW.GLOBALOFFROADSUPPLY.COM

Support Your Local Brawlers
www.RockBrawlers.com 

www.offroadtruckshow.com

WHITE_TRASH

Although not listed as a 37, Id pick the 38x12.5" tsl sx.  I have a set of 38x12.5 tsl's and I love them for everything and I can only think that the sx would be even better in ruts and having a thicker sidewall never killed anyone.
Full hydro, 186:1 with an auto and 44's what could go wrong??

4DEES

Quote from: Mike D on October 10, 2004, 09:15:13 PM
I decieded that the 38.5" TSL/SX tires would be a little to big for rock crawling. Now i just need some help decieding what would be the best. right now i am running the 33" TSL/SX and they had way more traction then the 35" bfg and pro comp muds. I haven't wheeled with any body who has mt/r's but i have heard they are like a slick in the mud. :dunno:
if you ask me, I dont think 38's would be too big. me and InfernalJeep both run 40 inch boggers and we take our rigs in in the rocks/mud/sand/trails and they work prfect. so in my opinion,I would either go 38 inch boggers or like WT said, the 38 tsl sx.
***ROCK BRAWLERS~Southern Cali***
www.rockbrawlers.com 

'85 Toy, 42's and a body lift!

ROCK IT TILL THE WHEELS FALL OFF!!

Fireimp141

Ive heard that MT/R are good on all xept for like thick mud, but if ure a trailer rigger or a rich  :moon: then id go with boggers, said to be good on just about everything :twocents:
86 Toyota 4runner, 33X12.5-15 Aurora RT/02's on Series 97 15X10 rock crawlers, 3" performance body lift, Rancho RS5000's... Soon to be Marlin 1200 Clutch, tube bumper front and rear, nerf bars and roof rack... future plans include SAS 5.29's detroits!

I am the Amazing Turtle! and I'm awarding you 49 points, increasing your Turtle Points!

4DEES

Quote from: Fireimp141 on October 11, 2004, 02:08:02 AM
Ive heard that MT/R are good on all xept for like thick mud, but if ure a trailer rigger or a rich :moon: then id go with boggers, said to be good on just about everything :twocents:
you dont gotta be a rich a$$, I paid $450 for six 40 inch boggers that still have 90% tread on 'em.you just gotta look in the right places.
***ROCK BRAWLERS~Southern Cali***
www.rockbrawlers.com 

'85 Toy, 42's and a body lift!

ROCK IT TILL THE WHEELS FALL OFF!!

RokCrawlinToy

I have 37" MTR and my rig is a daily driver. They ve worked great offroad and aren't as noisy on road as I thought they would be. Don't know how they do in the mud, I'd rather be Crawlin! :yupyup:

Mike D

the only reason i didn't consider the boggers cause this will be my daily driver and offroader just about every other weekend. And I am looking for a tire that is good in everything or real close. my fav would be the TSL/SX but wouldn't be better to get the 38.5"x14.5xR15 to get better stability than with the 38x12.5" :headscratch:
87 runner, 4" trailmaster lift, 33" TSL/SX, 5.29's V6 e-locker, 22re that cost too much

WHITE_TRASH

I havent had any real issues with stability on my 12.5's.  Funny thing is I have been running them on 7" wheels for about a year now too.  When I was wheeling on them all the time I ran them on 8's and they were fine.
Full hydro, 186:1 with an auto and 44's what could go wrong??

Mike D

you don't drive that everyday though or do you
87 runner, 4" trailmaster lift, 33" TSL/SX, 5.29's V6 e-locker, 22re that cost too much

WHITE_TRASH

I did for 4 years.  If you pay attention to your alignment and tire pressure and never forget to rotate them they will last for a LONG time.  Ive got just over 30 k on mine and they still have about 3/16" over the wear bars.
Full hydro, 186:1 with an auto and 44's what could go wrong??

Mike D

87 runner, 4" trailmaster lift, 33" TSL/SX, 5.29's V6 e-locker, 22re that cost too much

Hyena

MT/R's are good on everything but mud and wet rocks.  For some reason they don't like to grip wet rocks.

BLUCRUZ

Quote from: Hyena on October 11, 2004, 05:46:32 PM
MT/R's are good on everything but mud and wet rocks.  For some reason they don't like to grip wet rocks.

Sipe em for the wet rocks & they work better, but they will chunk out easier on the dry stuff.

I love my MT/R's except for the constant barking when on slick rocks and going around corners on the street. I've never really tested them in thick/sticky mud but they seem to do better than my old BFG's in all area's other than wear. They do wear better than Interco's though on daily driver. :twocents:
72 FJ40. 350 Multiport EFI, turbo 400, ORION T-case, 35 Procomp's  disk brakes front & rear, ARB's F&R and an onboard shower for the ladies!
86 sr-5 4runner SAS conversion. E-lockers F&R, 5.29's 4.7 Marlin case.

Mike D

well so far the mt/r's are kickin butt on the poll but does anybody else have experience with them in the mud
87 runner, 4" trailmaster lift, 33" TSL/SX, 5.29's V6 e-locker, 22re that cost too much

SWAMPER

Ppl I know with M/T's say they suck in mud...the mud dosent even have to be deep or gumbo for the mt's to become slicks...Id say go for the 38x12.5 if you do good amont of rock wheeling but if you do mud rocks and what not go with the 14 wide
1985 Toyota Pick/Up longbed...bobbed 15",  lifted 5", 36's.....http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=36992.0

BLUCRUZ

Sounds like a trip to the clay pits to do product testing....I'll let you know!
72 FJ40. 350 Multiport EFI, turbo 400, ORION T-case, 35 Procomp's  disk brakes front & rear, ARB's F&R and an onboard shower for the ladies!
86 sr-5 4runner SAS conversion. E-lockers F&R, 5.29's 4.7 Marlin case.

Mike D

please do. cause where i wheel you have to hit the mud or you are considered a pansy there is a lot of rocks but not to many people like them for some reason
87 runner, 4" trailmaster lift, 33" TSL/SX, 5.29's V6 e-locker, 22re that cost too much

Skinny_Pedal

Quote from: LILSWAMPER on October 11, 2004, 09:30:20 PM
Ppl I know with M/T's say they suck in mud...the mud dosent even have to be deep or gumbo for the mt's to become slicks...Id say go for the 38x12.5 if you do good amont of rock wheeling but if you do mud rocks and what not go with the 14 wide
have u tried them personallly?
Im an OG

SWAMPER

NO not myself but I have ridden on rigs with em...and I do say they cake up pretty fast...faster than my cheap o depo tires
1985 Toyota Pick/Up longbed...bobbed 15",  lifted 5", 36's.....http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=36992.0

Mike D

yeah and why not the 14.5" wide ones they would be more stable
87 runner, 4" trailmaster lift, 33" TSL/SX, 5.29's V6 e-locker, 22re that cost too much

WHITE_TRASH

Ive ran the 14.5's too.  They are a great tire but they are really heavy so they will sap mucho power to push down the road.
Full hydro, 186:1 with an auto and 44's what could go wrong??

Mike D

5.29 will make that better right :headscratch:
87 runner, 4" trailmaster lift, 33" TSL/SX, 5.29's V6 e-locker, 22re that cost too much

Fireimp141

Not really, gears only give better accelleration, but if thats what ure lookin for then yes, they will, but if u want more raw power, u need upgrades :beer:
86 Toyota 4runner, 33X12.5-15 Aurora RT/02's on Series 97 15X10 rock crawlers, 3" performance body lift, Rancho RS5000's... Soon to be Marlin 1200 Clutch, tube bumper front and rear, nerf bars and roof rack... future plans include SAS 5.29's detroits!

I am the Amazing Turtle! and I'm awarding you 49 points, increasing your Turtle Points!

Mike D

also if you really think about it there wouldn't be much more weight added. and today i was checking out some of the stuff at lc engeneering and holy crap 5,800 bucks for a 22re long block with 200+ hp :beerchug:
87 runner, 4" trailmaster lift, 33" TSL/SX, 5.29's V6 e-locker, 22re that cost too much

SWAMPER

Yeah I know its crazy....I could just spend like 1000 bucks in bolt ons and have around 200hp
1985 Toyota Pick/Up longbed...bobbed 15",  lifted 5", 36's.....http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=36992.0

Mike D

I want the header and the super charger and the turbo and the $1300 head and long block not to much only like 7 g's :yupyup:
87 runner, 4" trailmaster lift, 33" TSL/SX, 5.29's V6 e-locker, 22re that cost too much

SWAMPER

:slap: if you have 7 g's to spend on engine it be better to go with an Aluminum big block the Ram Jet 502...kicks some :moon:
1985 Toyota Pick/Up longbed...bobbed 15",  lifted 5", 36's.....http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=36992.0

Mike D

why can't everything be free :rivers: But i will most liky buy their header and camshaft kit with new rockers.
87 runner, 4" trailmaster lift, 33" TSL/SX, 5.29's V6 e-locker, 22re that cost too much