rockwells on a toyota.

Started by YODAWILL, July 08, 2008, 10:15:33 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

YODAWILL

I was wondering if you can run rockwells on a toyota with leafs front and rear and if so does anyone have pics.

jimbo74

:usa:

The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it. And one path we shall never choose, and that is the path of surrender, or submission.

~ John F. Kennedy ~

NorCalToy

or a person named "6.72:1" has a build thread on here he running rockwells with leaves.

build is under rig gallery
:willynilly: '89 truck SAS sittin on 35's, Tacoma rear axle w/ E-Locker, welded front

kneedownnate - You can go through life being scared of the possible, or you can have a little fun and tease the inevitable

iɹǝʌo ǝɯ ııoɹ sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı

:flamer: IFS

Wermz84

Well, he put them on.  But I don't think it has ever driven yet.  :down:  I have been waiting.


Edit:  gears, gears, gears.  :yupyup:
I like to Drive!

NorCalToy

Quote from: Wermz84 on July 08, 2008, 10:29:20 PM
Well, he put them on.  But I don't think it has ever driven yet.  :down:  I have been waiting.


Edit:  gears, gears, gears.  :yupyup:
me too!

and the Rdubs let you go really low in gears dont they? like 8-9:1 or close to it?
:willynilly: '89 truck SAS sittin on 35's, Tacoma rear axle w/ E-Locker, welded front

kneedownnate - You can go through life being scared of the possible, or you can have a little fun and tease the inevitable

iɹǝʌo ǝɯ ııoɹ sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı

:flamer: IFS

WHITE_TRASH

Well considering the guys name is 6.72:1 what do you suppose the ratio is in a rockwell? :greengrin:
Full hydro, 186:1 with an auto and 44's what could go wrong??

Wermz84

Quote from: WHITE_TRASH on July 08, 2008, 10:47:56 PM
Well considering the guys name is 6.72:1 what do you suppose the ratio is in a rockwell? :greengrin:
Hmmm I wonder.   :headscratch:      Haha!
I like to Drive!

YODAWILL

So I read up on his truck its nice, What I'm wondering is can you drive that on the street will it go 55-65
and will a 22re make go that fast and how many different 2 1/2 ton rockwells is there it seen like there is more then 1 and if so what is the difference between then I thinking of going with a set but I know nothing about them.

  Thanks.

Shamb

you need to do some research, rockwells are not street legal.

You probably could go 50 mph but your RPM's are gonna be pretty high with 6.72 or 7.17:1

I would say a rockwelled toyota isn't intended for street use, trail only.

It's like saying, "Hey can I put 54" boggers on my toyota and drive it at 70 mph?"

Sure you can, but I wouldn't do it nor would I recommend it.
R.I.P to my Papa, I miss you pops......

Knowledge is power  www.pirate4x4.com/forum

New Buildup in process 85' 4runner "Bad Decisions"
http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=52566.0

Check out my 1-ton build up thread
http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=22600.0

NorCalToy

Quote from: WHITE_TRASH on July 08, 2008, 10:47:56 PM
Well considering the guys name is 6.72:1 what do you suppose the ratio is in a rockwell? :greengrin:
i meant more of "whats the lowest  you can go?"
:willynilly: '89 truck SAS sittin on 35's, Tacoma rear axle w/ E-Locker, welded front

kneedownnate - You can go through life being scared of the possible, or you can have a little fun and tease the inevitable

iɹǝʌo ǝɯ ııoɹ sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı

:flamer: IFS

freds40

There are a few different Rockwell axles. There is front loaders, top loaders, planetary, etc.

The most commonly used Rockwell is the 2.5 ton top loader.  They have 6.72 gears and that is all that is available for them. Randy Ouverson is currently building aftermarket thirds that will accept both 6.72 and 4.89 (IIRC) gears but they are still in the developmental stage.

Top Loaders are what came in the military 2.5 ton trucks and there is no reason they can't be street driven. However, I wouldn't recommend running Rocks on the street. Because of the 6.72 gearing, you would have to run at least a 44" tire to get the RPMs close to factory @ 65 on the freeway.

With a 44, you will spin roughly 300 RPM faster than stock @ 65. If you were to run a more reasonable street size of say a 39.5, your Rs would be about 600 higher than stock.
"between projects"

YODAWILL

Thanks for the info guys this helped alot. :biggthumpup:

NorCalToy

whats the biggest a stock 2.5 ton rockwell cam handle? (tire size)
:willynilly: '89 truck SAS sittin on 35's, Tacoma rear axle w/ E-Locker, welded front

kneedownnate - You can go through life being scared of the possible, or you can have a little fun and tease the inevitable

iɹǝʌo ǝɯ ııoɹ sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı

:flamer: IFS

iNfErNaL

Quote from: NorCalToy on July 09, 2008, 03:48:47 PM
whats the biggest a stock 2.5 ton rockwell cam handle? (tire size)
I've seen people running 54s with rocks.
WWW.GLOBALOFFROADSUPPLY.COM

Support Your Local Brawlers
www.RockBrawlers.com 

www.offroadtruckshow.com

NorCalToy

Quote from: Infernal on July 09, 2008, 04:21:19 PM
I've seen people running 54s with rocks.
:yikes: thanks for the answer  :bananabeer:

that would be awesome....i now have realized my end goal... :drool:
:willynilly: '89 truck SAS sittin on 35's, Tacoma rear axle w/ E-Locker, welded front

kneedownnate - You can go through life being scared of the possible, or you can have a little fun and tease the inevitable

iɹǝʌo ǝɯ ııoɹ sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı

:flamer: IFS

freds40

Quote from: NorCalToy on July 09, 2008, 03:48:47 PM
whats the biggest a stock 2.5 ton rockwell cam handle? (tire size)

All depends on how you drive and what kind of power you're putting to the ground. For stock Rezepa shafts in a front steering application I'd say a 40 is decent and a 42 is getting questionable. For stock u-joint shafts in front I'd say you could get away with 44s.

For a rear steer application I wouldn't run much more than 42s on any stock shaft and I'd take it easy @ that.

You could definately beat on a rear steer axle with 42s and Ouverson's Alloy replacement shafts. Probably get away with 44s as well.

Anything bigger in a rear steer application I'd say you need Ouverson's 2" Alloys.
"between projects"

Shamb

a typical rockwell has axle shafts about the same size as a dana 60.

pretty beefy.

look up Dan Dibble's old rig, he put aftermarket 40 splines in his   :yikes:
R.I.P to my Papa, I miss you pops......

Knowledge is power  www.pirate4x4.com/forum

New Buildup in process 85' 4runner "Bad Decisions"
http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=52566.0

Check out my 1-ton build up thread
http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=22600.0

freds40

they're actually Ouverson's 2" Alloy 47 spline shafts.

A 60 has 1.50" shafts and a Rock is 1.61 IIRC.
"between projects"

NorCalToy

so a rockwell really isnt that much stronger than a 60?
:willynilly: '89 truck SAS sittin on 35's, Tacoma rear axle w/ E-Locker, welded front

kneedownnate - You can go through life being scared of the possible, or you can have a little fun and tease the inevitable

iɹǝʌo ǝɯ ııoɹ sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı

:flamer: IFS

WHITE_TRASH

Stock for stock not really.  But as soon as you start modding them the rockwell shoves its stub shaft up the 60's hub and goes to town...  :hahaha:
Full hydro, 186:1 with an auto and 44's what could go wrong??

freds40

Quote from: WHITE_TRASH on July 09, 2008, 09:58:21 PM
Stock for stock not really.  But as soon as you start modding them the rockwell shoves its stub shaft up the 60's hub and goes to town...  :hahaha:

Yup. A stock Rock u-joint shaft has a static load of roughly 1,600 ft/lbs more than a stock 60 (30 spline). Add 35 spline outers to a 60 and those numbers come a lot closer.

For $1000, you can get Ouverson's stock replacement 16 spline Alloy shafts and they are rated @ 3x the strength of the stock u_joint shafts. If you really want to step up, you can get the 47 spline 2"ers. Last I had talked to Randy, he couldn't give a figure on strength of the 2"ers because no one had broken one yet.
"between projects"

6.72:1

Quote from: Wermz84 on July 08, 2008, 10:29:20 PM
Well, he put them on.  But I don't think it has ever driven yet.  :down:  I have been waiting.


Edit:  gears, gears, gears.  :yupyup:

I have driven it, but not that far. It needs a little TLC to be complete, but right now, it is in storage for a year until I can afford to build a new shop at my new home....
[email protected]
Cell: (205) 919-3290
www.Kupferphotography.com

Wermz84

Quote from: 6.72:1 on November 01, 2008, 03:08:16 PM
I have driven it, but not that far. It needs a little TLC to be complete, but right now, it is in storage for a year until I can afford to build a new shop at my new home....

:woohoo:  It Lives!!   :willynilly:   Right on.  Good luck with the shop build,  let us know when you get going again.  :thumbup:
I like to Drive!