Author Topic: Transfer case ratio question???  (Read 2608 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

93REDCRAWLER

  • Offline Crawler Guru
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: 110
  • Male Posts: 563
  • Member since Nov '10
  • You see it we wheel it
    • View Profile
Transfer case ratio question???
« on: Jul 07, 2017, 10:09:42 PM »
So I'm currently running duels  2.28 in the crawl box 4.7 in the transfer case with the upgraded 23 spline input . This is on a 4 cylinder so the crawlbox has the 21 spline input . Could I run 4.7s in both cases with 21 input in the front and 23 in the rear? Is anyone running this setup now? Or is t just going to brake? Thanks for the help in advance

blackdiamond

  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 1174
  • Male Posts: 5,058
  • Member since Dec '03
  • Crawlin with Marlin
    • View Profile
Re: Transfer case ratio question???
« Reply #1 on: Jul 08, 2017, 09:29:34 AM »
I doubt that it is a guarantee that it t would break but I know Marlin Crawler has a strong preference for having the 4.70 gears in the rear case in a dual ultimate setup.

The real question is why you think going that low is necessary?  I also run the dual ultimate gearing and can't see a real value for lower gearing. If you truly do have a need then do it right. If not then don't waste the money. 

The reason BigMike runs triples is that having the 2.28 gears is valuable and you'd be eliminating seversl useful gear ranges by only having 4.7 and 4.7 x 4.7.

2.28 and 2.28 x 4.7 are of far more practical use than 4.7 x 4.7 will ever be.
1989 4Runner: Dual Ultimate (Inchworm front & Marlin 4.70 rear), Marlin Twin Stick, 1200-lb clutch, 4.88 R&P, Aussie Front, Detroit rear, 30-spline Longs, Long hub gears, ARP hub and knuckle studs & 35x12.50 Cooper STT PRO tires.  Marlin rear bumper & sliders.  FROR front bumper.  SAS with Alcan springs & Rancho 9000XL shocks.  Budbuilt Bolt-on traction bar.  Custom Interior Cage by Those Guys Rod and Customs.

Moab Tested & Rubicon Approved

93REDCRAWLER [OP]

  • Offline Crawler Guru
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: 110
  • Male Posts: 563
  • Member since Nov '10
  • You see it we wheel it
    • View Profile
Re: Transfer case ratio question???
« Reply #2 on: Jul 08, 2017, 02:06:43 PM »
I doubt that it is a guarantee that it t would break but I know Marlin Crawler has a strong preference for having the 4.70 gears in the rear case in a dual ultimate setup.

The real question is why you think going that low is necessary?  I also run the dual ultimate gearing and can't see a real value for lower gearing. If you truly do have a need then do it right. If not then don't waste the money. 

The reason BigMike runs triples is that having the 2.28 gears is valuable and you'd be eliminating seversl useful gear ranges by only having 4.7 and 4.7 x 4.7.

2.28 and 2.28 x 4.7 are of far more practical use than 4.7 x 4.7 will ever be.


Thanks black diamond  for some info!  Some things I haven't thought about yet. 

T-Revv

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 722
  • Male Posts: 280
  • Member since Apr '17
  • Crawlin at work, Crawlin on the trails. best life.
    • View Profile
Re: Transfer case ratio question???
« Reply #3 on: Jul 19, 2017, 10:54:51 AM »
Marlin called the box with a 2.28 and 4.7 the Dual Ultimate for a reason.  He truly believes it is the ultimate gear ratio.  (wheeling with him last week he told me his favorite for most situations is dual ultimate 2nd gear, and going into dual ultimate 1st when he really is looking for that slow crawl).  Marlin ran all 4.7 gears for awhile but it wasn't worth losing that 2.28 factory low.  So now he runs triple cases 2.28, 4.7 and 4.7.  Just show he can demonstrate different gearing options to people, but when hes wheeling you'll never see him drop below dual ultimate 1st gear.  Same with Big mike, in his 81 he has triple cases with 2.28, 2.28 and 4.7 for demonstration purposes but mike is usually in single 4.7 or dual Ultimate. Riding with Mike in his Tacoma on the Rubicon this last weekend was the same.  There is no need to go dual 4.7 Overkill box, and is definitely not worth losing the factory low.
"I dunno I just woke up from a lil nap, it's a lil dark but you guys silly? I'm still gonna send it."

T-Revv

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 722
  • Male Posts: 280
  • Member since Apr '17
  • Crawlin at work, Crawlin on the trails. best life.
    • View Profile
Re: Transfer case ratio question???
« Reply #4 on: Jul 19, 2017, 11:30:25 AM »
As far as running a 21 spline with a 4.7 in the crawl box, it should make no difference if that is 21 or 23 spline.  It has to be whatever your transmission is to match the female in inside your transmission.  You're not applying anymore torque to the input shaft on the front of the crawl box by changing the gear ratio inside, it will always be the amount torque coming from the trans being applied to that part.  It is after the crawl box where that torque is multiplied, so you would be putting double the stress on the 23 spline input between the two cases. There is a much higher risk of breaking that 23 spline with that much torque going to it, which is why it is suggested to  run the 4.7 in the back.  But its been done plenty of times with no problems.  That's why marlin makes his total spline input with no neck down spot like other companies.
"I dunno I just woke up from a lil nap, it's a lil dark but you guys silly? I'm still gonna send it."

YooperYota

  • Offline Rock Crawl'n
  • **
  • Turtle Points: 6
  • Posts: 31
  • Member since Jan '16
  • Crawling with Marlin
    • View Profile
Re: Transfer case ratio question???
« Reply #5 on: Sep 11, 2017, 12:52:49 PM »
The best part about dual ultimate imo is that you have 3 low ranges. More options. Going to double 4.7s would remove a low range, less versatile.

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk


redneckcustoms13

  • Offline The 2.5K Group
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: 7674
  • Male Posts: 2,513
  • Member since May '15
    • View Profile
    • Buy me a beer
Re: Transfer case ratio question???
« Reply #6 on: Sep 12, 2017, 05:05:58 AM »
I have a single 4.7 in one of my rigs and a dual 2.28 on another. I prefer the dual 2.28 over a single 4.7 because it is much more useful. A single 4.7 is often too low (I know it doesn't sound right lol). A 2.28/4.7 would be amazing in my book. A set up like big mike is running would truly be the best of all possible options.
83 long bed 2wd sas, 3rz, w56, duals with 4.7 rear, 4.88 elock front, spartan rear, 39.5 iroks
01 double cab hunting truck
06 tacoma street truck

 
 
 
 
 

Related Topics

4 Replies
2713 Views
Last post May 14, 2002, 04:30:08 AM
by RogueDogg
6 Replies
2229 Views
Last post Dec 02, 2004, 09:57:50 PM
by MidgetMike
13 Replies
7883 Views
Last post Jan 29, 2006, 05:49:29 PM
by wrenchtech
11 Replies
4481 Views
Last post Dec 29, 2005, 04:41:55 PM
by Wermz84
3 Replies
3290 Views
Last post Oct 23, 2007, 01:17:01 PM
by mmessier2