Topic: Public comments on public lands access

[85-4roller]

With the new Administration and it's new Pro environmentalist anti internal combustion engine cabinet members, the public land closures and restrictions will rapidly increase, please consider sending email messages to express your opinion and concern on these issues. Before they are all closed and further restricted.


OHV sierras coments:
Jody.nickerson@usda.com

Pismo comments:

OceanoDunes.PWP.EIR@parks.ca.gov

ohvinfo.ohv@parks.ca.gov

OceanoDunesReview@coastal.ca.gov

[Gnarly4X]

Hey 85....

Your post is a nice gesture of goodness and rightfulness. 

20 years ago, letters to your City, State, and Congress people might have meant something.

Today, the radical Marxist left doesn't give a ratsa$$ what conservative patriotic Americans think!

It's all about lining their pockets with money, and it has never been more obvious!

Gnarls.

[sirdeuce]

Next up......

Restrictions on private land usage!


                                                                                                 


                                                                                                NOT !

[Gnarly4X]

Next up......

Restrictions on private land usage!


                                                                                                 


                                                                                                NOT !

That has been going on for decades.  Now the communist party is just doing it openly!!

Basically, almost ANY government agency can TAKE YOUR PRIVATE LAND AND PAY YOU NOTHING!!

"A taking occurs when the government encroaches upon or occupies private land for its own proposed use. Even a minimal permanent physical occupation of real property requires compensation under the takings clause.  For instance, governmental regulation of property can sometimes constitute a taking.

Generally, takings claims arise two ways:

Physical taking;
Regulatory taking.
A physical taking occurs when the government encroaches upon private land for its own proposed use.  A regulatory taking can arise although the government actions do not encroach upon or occupy the property but still affect and limit its use to such an extent that a taking occurs.  Regulatory takings are based on the principle that while property may be regulated to a certain extent, if a regulation goes too far it will be recognized as a taking[ii].

The takings clause is generally held to apply to two types of governmental action:

Taking of property by the government’s eminent domain power;
Taking of property by inverse condemnation.
The power of eminent domain is an inherent sovereign power. The eminent domain power allows the government to take private property for the benefit of the public after paying just compensation.  Inverse condemnation occurs when government regulation condemns some or all of the use of the property, diminishing the value to its owners to such an extent that it is as if the government had condemned the property[iii].

Inverse condemnation leads to the de facto taking by eminent domain through the state’s power to regulate, whereas a taking by the eminent domain power is an explicit use of the sovereign power[iv].

However, not every acquisition of a private property interest by a state constitutes a taking such as the taxing power, the police power, or the power to purchase property.  The state may acquire private property interests in a manner that does not constitute a taking.  Moreover, when the government acquires such an interest through a power other than its taking power, just compensation is not constitutionally required[v]."