0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
At 7psi these things get about a 15" long tread patch. Pretty compliant carcasses. 12 psi would have been fine and made steering easier. These things definitely flex and ooze around rocks very well. In the second photo below you can see the side wall contorting around a small boulder pretty well. I'm expecting great things from these tires in deep snow based on this.
What pressure are you running on the street?Wearing out the center sounds like overinflation.
I would like to add again that I do in fact like these tires. I'm just trying to be super objective and honest in this review, no just say "these are the bestest tires ever" just because I am running them. The welded rear is definitely a factor, but even with that I don't see these getting the tread life of earlier incarnations. Last set of 4 KOs we ran were on a truck I had for work and then on my buddies '85 4runner, both with welded rears, and we ran them for well over 40K, I'm guessing closer to 50K. Those were 33x9.50 15s and had a very flat tread profile at street pressure on 8" wheels. I bought those back in 2006. Same old story where they started to crack out before they were worn out.
Having a bit of mud lately. I am finding these to be pretty decent in mud that you can penetrate, and anything slightly "tacky" . I said it before but the side lug treatment works well in ruts. If it's flat hard bottom with grease mud on top, not so much. In true gumbo they pack up pretty easy. A lot of wheel speed helps here but still not performing equal to a mud tire. The Falkens were actually better in the mud.I have found they are hydroplaning more than I would like in our rutted 2 laner highways.Looking forward to some more snow where these things shine...
Not too happy to hear about you having hydroplaning issues. Was leaning towards them but in WA we get rain ocassionally.
I would not run these in a 12.50 in WA. If it were a skinnier size on a smaller rig I don't think it would be a problem. We have these in 235/85 16 on our chevy 1 ton and they don't hydroplane at all. The wideness really comes into play for sure.Best 12.50 wide tires I have had for no hydroplaning were the MTR w/Kevlar. You didn't even feel the water, even at 20% tread depth. I think it's the angle of the voids.
I know interco has this size but I'm not taking long trips with a swamper.
thanks for the thorough review. I wish they would make this tire in a 34x10.5r15 or 34x11r15. I like the skinnys. I don't understand why is there a 30,31,32,33,35 but no 34? what is wrong with this country? I know interco has this size but I'm not taking long trips with a swamper.
OK I did my rotation and checked tread depth with just a little over 18,000 miles on these tires (ODO at 216,912, mounted up tires at 198,800). Tread depths range from 33%-51% with an average of 42% for all five tires. At this rate I would say I will get right at 30,000 miles on these. Not real impressive for an AT since I got about 32,000 out of only 4 MTRs, but as good as these are in the snow and ice, that might be OK. I drove to work on silver, shiny ice today and it felt like dry pavement. That's really saying something for a too tall, spooled rear truck on rutted 2 laner.If these continue to impress me through the winter I may just say they are a good enough fit for what we use this vehicle for to get another set.
An Aussie locker could pay for itself in a couple sets of tires if it resulted in 25% longer life.
True but we like the way the spooled rear handles on dirt. Weird I know.You are correct though it totally pencils out.
Started by 85lockdtoy Parts For Sale
Started by rick80 Parts For Sale
Started by ctdellerman Parts For Sale
Started by kneedownnate Parts For Sale
Started by H8PVMNT Tire and Wheel Tech