Author Topic: Groups File Suit to Preserve Future Access to Surprise Canyon Road  (Read 3754 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

whyt

  • Offline Dusty Trails
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 0
  • Posts: 2
  • Member since Nov '03
  • I Love My Marlin Crawler!
    • View Profile
From: www.fopv.org/pr.html

For Immediate Release: September 7, 2006

Contact:
Bryan Lollich, Vice President, Friends of Panamint Valley, www.fopv.org

Groups File Suit to Preserve Future Access
to Surprise Canyon Road

Washington, DC – On September 7, 2006, groups representing private property owners, as well as other members of the public, filed suit against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and National Park Service (NPS) for illegally denying access on Surprise Canyon Road, a public road.

“The BLM and NPS have tried to assert jurisdiction over Surprise Canyon Road since 2001,” says Kris Tholke, an owner of private property near Panamint City.  “Surprise Canyon Road is a public road, and has been since its creation in 1874.  Therefore, the BLM and NPS have no jurisdiction over this road". 

Access to Surprise Canyon Road was restricted in 2001 as a result of a lawsuit brought against the BLM by the Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.  The resulting settlement agreement required the erecting of a gate across the road to restrict access, although the agreement was supposed to protect private property rights by exempting owners of private property from the closure.  To date, however, the BLM and NPS have denied all requests for access to private property via Surprise Canyon Road.

“Surprise Canyon road was created over 130 years ago, and was used consistently to reach private property until it was closed in 2001” says Bryan Lollich, Vice President of Friends of Panamint Valley.  “The road is a valid R.S. 2477 right of way and is further protected under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, the California Desert Protection Act, and current Department of Interior guidelines.”

Congress enacted "Revised Statute 2477" in 1866, granting a “right of way for the construction of highways over public lands.”  This grant was repealed by FLPMA in 1976, but all valid R.S. 2477 rights of way at the time of repeal were allowed to continue.  Because the Surprise Canyon Road was a valid right-of-way at the time of FLPMA’s enactment in 1976, it remains a valid R.S. 2477 right-of-way.

Surprise Canyon Road is located on the western slope of the Panamint Mountains and is the only access route to the historic site of Panamint City and the surrounding private property.  Surprise Canyon Road and Panamint City are in a non-wilderness "cherry stem" created by an act of Congress, surrounded by the Surprise Canyon Wilderness area and Death Valley National Park.  A “cherry stem” means that they were specifically excluded from the wilderness because they did not meet the wilderness criteria.  The cherry stem of Surprise Canyon Road and Panamint City was created by Congress to insure future public access to this historic town, and private property in the area. 


# # # #

Hottrod81

  • Offline The 1K Club
  • *
  • Turtle Points: -2
  • Male Posts: 1,392
  • Member since Feb '05
  • Full Trucker Effect
    • View Profile

Rocksurfer

  • Momentum Man
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 730
  • Male Posts: 13,860
  • Member since Jul '04
  • Lego Enforcement
    • View Profile
    • Spinnin4s 4x4 Club
If we win this it will create a landslide of reopening of closed access roads. :crossed:
The Ghost-Rider/Ghost Runner

No matter how far you fall, the ground will always catch you

Hottrod81

  • Offline The 1K Club
  • *
  • Turtle Points: -2
  • Male Posts: 1,392
  • Member since Feb '05
  • Full Trucker Effect
    • View Profile
4wd groups are banding together like never before and are starting to muster the financial power of the environmentalists.

Rocksurfer

  • Momentum Man
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 730
  • Male Posts: 13,860
  • Member since Jul '04
  • Lego Enforcement
    • View Profile
    • Spinnin4s 4x4 Club
If we could get all outdoor enthusiasts to band together to fight these Eco-nuts we'd far out number them but for some reason we don't, just think if sandrail, offroaders, dirtbikers, bmx'ers, skiers, etc, etc banded together to shut these people down so that everyone could have access to and enjoy the outdoors instead of an elitist few that want to keep it all to themselves. Problem is getting everyone on the same page instead of just what's best for their group only.
The Ghost-Rider/Ghost Runner

No matter how far you fall, the ground will always catch you

Rocksurfer

  • Momentum Man
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 730
  • Male Posts: 13,860
  • Member since Jul '04
  • Lego Enforcement
    • View Profile
    • Spinnin4s 4x4 Club
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-surprise28nov28,1,2840038.story?ctrack=1&cset=true


Will Surprise Canyon remain off limits to off-road drivers?
Four-wheel-drive enthusiasts want to reopen the wild road, but environmentalists say no. The fight over the state road is in federal court.
By Lee Romney, Times Staff Writer
November 28, 2006

Five years after it was temporarily closed to off-road enthusiasts who winched their vehicles up its limestone waterfalls, a coveted canyon on Death Valley National Park's western edge has been reclaimed by nature's hand.

Thick willow groves have erased nearly all traces of the washed-out road that once pointed extreme sportsmen to the ruins of a onetime silver boom town. Bighorn sheep appear with greater frequency, conservationists note, and the endangered Inyo California towhee has returned.

But the battle for Surprise Canyon, home of the longest year-round stream in the Panamint Range, has revved up a notch: More than 100 four-wheel-drive aficionados determined to see their prized run reopened have filed a lawsuit in federal court that is being closely watched throughout the West.

The claim relies on a Civil War-era mining law that allowed counties and states to lay routes over federal land. Although the statute, known as RS 2477, was repealed three decades ago, routes established before then were allowed under a grandfather clause. A gravel toll road in Surprise Canyon that fell into public hands before succumbing to flooding is such a route, the lawsuit contends.

Battles over what routes qualify have intensified in recent years across Utah and other Western states, as emboldened counties, off-road enthusiasts and private landholders seek to wrest from federal hands thousands of old rights-of-way, rutted vehicle trails and even cattle paths.

But the Surprise Canyon claim — which demands that the Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service immediately reopen the canyon to vehicles — appears to be the first federal court fight over a California route.

Since the Surprise Canyon suit was filed in late August, Inyo and San Bernardino counties have filed separate RS 2477 federal court claims that assert local control over 18 other routes.

Six environmental groups are seeking to intervene in the Surprise Canyon case, hoping to see the canyon permanently closed and to weigh in on the antiquated statute.

"This is a law that was passed a year after Lincoln was assassinated and repealed 30 years ago, and its dead hand is still haunting the protection of our national parks," said Ted Zukoski, a Denver staff attorney with Earthjustice, which is representing the environmental groups. "What they are attempting to do is to undermine protection for these beautiful wild areas."

Although Utah "has really been the epicenter of this debate," Zukoski added, "it certainly seems like the California desert is becoming another area where there's a tremendous amount of pressure on this issue."

Brian Hawthorne of the Idaho-based Blue Ribbon Coalition, which represents off-road enthusiasts, said the disputes are real and must be resolved to clarify where vehicles are permitted.

Hawthorne said he'd prefer to see the conflicts settled outside court: A New Mexico congressman last month proposed legislation that would allow states or counties to gain title by producing any official map or survey made before 1976. But Hawthorne conceded that passage was unlikely.

"We are looking at a monumental battle over each and every one of these roads," said Hawthorne, whose group has not taken a stance on Surprise Canyon.

Built in 1874, Surprise Canyon Road carried miners to Panamint City. Constant washouts prompted regular rebuilding. But a 1984 flash flood wreaked havoc that no one chose to counter.

Then, in 1989, hard-core off-road enthusiasts stacked boulders and pruned back willows to clear a path for their tricked-out machines, forging a route that at times took them directly through the stream bed and — with the help of steel winch cables — up its seven slick waterfalls. (The road had previously covered the stream, pushing it underground in places, before flooding stripped the canyon to bedrock.)

The California Desert Protection Act in 1994 placed the upper portion of Surprise in Death Valley National Park and designated the Bureau of Land Management portion below as wilderness. But Congress excluded a narrow strip of land around the washed-out road. That made it legally open to off-roaders, and the canyon's cachet grew.

Critics of the riders say they destroyed sensitive riparian habitat of the Panamint daisy and Panamint alligator lizard and spilled oil, gas and antifreeze in the water. The riders counter that they maintained the ghost town buildings and regularly hauled out trash. They also point out that the road had been host to a steady stream of cars for decades.

Off-road use came to a halt in 2001 when, as the result of a settlement in a broader lawsuit filed by the Center for Biological Diversity, the canyon was temporarily closed pending a detailed joint environmental review by both federal agencies. (The current lawsuit demands that the canyon be reopened regardless of the review.)

The 2001 settlement noted that the smattering of property owners up the canyon would be exempted and could request a key to the gate barring access to the road. To the off-road winchers, that smelled like an opportunity.

"What would you do if you wanted to get up there?" asked Joe Stocker, 70, a retired millwright who made dozens of canyon winch runs and is a plaintiff in the new case.
« Last Edit: Dec 23, 2006, 08:55:52 PM by Rocksurfer »
The Ghost-Rider/Ghost Runner

No matter how far you fall, the ground will always catch you

Rocksurfer

  • Momentum Man
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 730
  • Male Posts: 13,860
  • Member since Jul '04
  • Lego Enforcement
    • View Profile
    • Spinnin4s 4x4 Club
http://www.sbsun.com/search/ci_4763866
A classic clash over canyon
Andrew Silva, Staff Writer
Article Launched: 12/03/2006 12:00:00 AM PST

SURPRISE CANYON - David Bricker first rode up this narrow, lush canyon bordered by desert wilderness just outside Death Valley on a small Honda-90 dirt bike in 1969.
A passable gravel road through the verdant canyon up a mountainside in Inyo County was first established in the 1870s as access to the silver-mining town of Panamint City, situated nearly 4,000 feet above the valley floor.

Today the canyon is at the center of a classic preservation-versus-use conflict, like many that have erupted across the Mojave Desert for the past two decades.
Closed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to off-highway vehicles in 2001 as part of a legal settlement with environmentalists, the canyon is the subject of a new suit by recreational off-roaders and people who have bought property in the ghost town and now want road access to their land.

The emotional conflict is spelled out inside a phone-book sized, red-metal box at the floor of the canyon in a spot overlooking the gurgling creek a few feet below. Hikers can sign in and leave comments.

"It's beautiful. Keep the vehicles out," one hiker wrote.

"No vehicles. No way," another entry reads.

"Open the canyon to everyone. Vehicles too," wrote another.

For those seeking to drive up the canyon, the matter centers on the government keeping its 150-year-old promise that private property owners are entitled to have access to their own land.

Environmentalists argue the canyon is a unique resource that deserves to be protected.

"There are thousands of miles of routes and hundreds of thousands of acres for off-road vehicle use," said Howard Gross of the National Parks Conservation Association. "Only a handful of people want access to Surprise Canyon. It might be fun to draw a mustache on Mount Rushmore, but most people would find that behavior inappropriate and insulting."

It's one of the wettest, lushest canyons in the Panamint Range, the mountains that mark the western boundary of one of the driest places on Earth.

From the days when a small motorcycle or a pickup truck could make it to the remote town, the area has changed. And over the past 130 years, it's undergone remarkable transformations with several boom-and-bust cycles - each boom interrupted by one of the roaring gully washers that wiped out mining operations.

Back in the canyon the day before Thanksgiving, the 50-year-old Bricker this time sported a backpack instead of a motorcycle helmet as he, his 18-year-old son and a friend scrambled through heavy brush and down tricky waterfalls as they neared the end of a multi-day camping trip to the historic ghost town.

The string of several cascading waterfalls, tucked between sculpted white granite walls, were once buried under tons of gravel. The falls were uncovered in 1984 by a huge storm that also flushed out the road and ended the most recent mining effort.

Half-buried rusting hulks of trucks and mining equipment dot the rugged canyon floor, entombed testaments to the power of a desert cloudburst.

Instead of a road, there's now a challenging hiking trail requiring tough stretches of bushwhacking, some brief rock-climbing moves, and splashing through inch-deep water in the middle of the creek.

"I have mixed feelings," said Bricker, who grew up in Southern California before moving to New York 20 years ago but never losing his fascination with Death Valley and the surrounding desert.

As he adjusted his pack straps, standing in a spot that was relatively wide at about 50 feet, he explained: "I'm ecology-minded at heart, but this habitat isn't much different from other habitats in the Panamints."

After the great flood of 1984, the only vehicles that could get up the canyon were the hardiest Jeeps and other four-wheel-drive vehicles equipped with winches.

And while there are many other canyons in the Panamints open to off-road recreation, by the 1990s, Surprise Canyon had become legendary among extreme off-roaders.

Winches mounted on the rigs hoisted the vehicles up the steep, rocky waterfalls.

Large rocks were maneuvered into the creek to fill in impassable gaps.

The challenging nature of the route isn't the reason for the lawsuit, plaintiffs contend.

"It's not the off-roading; it's the destination," said Bryan Lollich, a 32-year-old Colorado Springs, Colo., resident who bought land in Panamint City after the closure in 2001. "Everyone that's driven up that road has fallen in love with Panamint City."

Even when the canyon was closed, the BLM promised to give those who owned property in the ghost town a key to the newly erected gate.

More than five years later, that hasn't happened.

"These groups want to see all that history preserved. Without the off-highway vehicle crowd, it's not going to be preserved," Lollich said by phone from his Colorado home.

When Death Valley was upgraded and expanded from a national monument to a national park in 1994, the route through Surprise Canyon was designated a "cherry stem," meaning the 60-foot-wide right-of-way was specifically omitted from the new wilderness area through which it runs.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who shepherded the California Desert Protection Act through Congress in 1994, supported the "cherry stem" at the time because there were valid mining claims in Panamint City and it was unknown if mining would resume.

But in a December 2005 letter, she and California's junior senator, Democrat Barbara Boxer, also urged officials to close the canyon to vehicles permanently.

"However, it is our understanding that no mining activity has taken place for decades and it appears that the current land owners have no interest in mining. Consequently, recreational off-roading in Surprise Canyon should not be viewed as an authorized activity under the California Desert Protection Act," the senators wrote.

Environmentalists charge that the off-roaders bought property in the abandoned town only to give them legal leverage to force the canyon open.

That's irrelevant, plaintiffs and their attorney said, because the government cannot bar access to someone's private property.

"Congress granted rights to counties and the public on these roads, and the federal government can't take them away," Wyoming attorney Karen Budd-Falen said.

Separate from the lawsuits, the BLM and the National Park Service are nearing the end of an environmental-review process to decide what to do with the canyon.

The environmental-impact statement is due out before spring and will analyze several options.

Surprise Canyon could remain closed. It could be reopened to vehicles. It could be opened to vehicles with tight restrictions on how far up they can go or how many could go at a time.

Lollich, the Panamint City property owner, said access all the way up must be allowed.

For environmentalists, the choice is stark.

"Water in the desert is so rare & . It's a blessing. It sort of feels like you're cheating," said Gross of the National Parks Conservation Association, a nonprofit group that has applied to intervene in the off-roaders' suit.

As he strode up the steep trail bordered by lush vegetation with clear water splashing over the rocks, he spread his arms and asked: "This is going to be a highway?"

Standing among the cottonwoods and willows, one can look out over the nearly barren Panamint Valley, a striking contrast.

In the dry language of the BLM's environmental assessment that accompanied the 2001 closure, an official wrote: "The diversity of vegetative communities in Surprise Canyon contribute to providing niches for a diverse wildlife community, `perhaps one of the most diverse and significant in the California Desert Conservation Area."'

With bighorn sheep, the Panamint alligator lizard and endangered birds thriving on the perennial water and the oasis of vegetation, allowing vehicles back in the canyon would damage a rare and fragile ecosystem, environmentalists argue.

Bigger species seem more common in the canyon since the closure, they say.

"We saw a bighorn (sheep)," said Samantha Raven, 30, of San Raphael as she and a friend descended from spending a night at Panamint City, which she loved.

"(The trail) was really tough," said her companion, Chuck Collingwood, 50, also of San Raphael, who added he also likes to go four-wheeling. "But I have a little trouble with a road through a stream."

Another set of hikers that same day said they would love to be able to ride their motorcycles up the canyon, and that it should be reopened before the overgrowth made it absolutely impassable.

"Riders are respectful of the trail," said Alisha Young, 36, of Santa Rosa.

Rebuilding the road to its pre-1984 condition probably won't get serious consideration, said Richard Crowe, a land-use planner in the BLM's Ridgecrest office and the leader for the environmental-impact statement.

There are other canyons with water in the Panamints, so species do have other options, Crowe said, but the canyon's relative importance to the desert web of life is one of the questions being examined.

A 2004 study of snails and other invertebrates, some of which are unique to that part of the Mojave, warned that off-road vehicles in Surprise Canyon could harm species directly and also upset the cycle of regrowth that follows flash floods.
The Ghost-Rider/Ghost Runner

No matter how far you fall, the ground will always catch you

Rocksurfer

  • Momentum Man
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 730
  • Male Posts: 13,860
  • Member since Jul '04
  • Lego Enforcement
    • View Profile
    • Spinnin4s 4x4 Club
Those who want vehicle access restored counter that the occasional Jeep can safely coexist with the plants and animals.

When the road was open, about 100 vehicles per year would take the difficult trip up the canyon, which still required trees, cattails and other plants to be cut down.

Environmentalists allege the vehicles have overturned and spilled toxic engine fluids into the stream.

"I don't know of any documentation that oil or gas or antifreeze has caused a die-off," the BLM's Crowe said.

Just to add another wrinkle, the creek is also eligible for protection as a wild and scenic river. But only Congress can make that designation.

Derham Giuliani, a 75-year-old retired biologist from the eastern Sierra town of Big Pine, was on his first trip into the canyon since the road disappeared two decades ago.

Standing at one of the waterfalls where the canyon is 20 feet wide, he marveled that any vehicles could get up there.

"I'd prefer it be closed," he said. "A riparian area like this is rare in the desert. I don't see how they could put a road back."

Bricker said he was worried more about preserving Panamint City.

"It wouldn't be as pristine, but on the positive side, you could preserve the best relics of the area," he said. "In 35 years, I'd like (my son) Noah to be able to bring his son and show him."

Bricker would like to see access for motor vehicles restored, which would allow maintenance of the aging historic buildings in Panamint City.

"It's hard to carry 4-by-8 sheets of plywood on your back," he said. "The off-roaders I know don't look at the falls as a challenge; they're trying to get to Panamint City."

The ghost town is within the boundaries of Death Valley National Park, and the park doesn't have the money or people to keep up the buildings there, said Terry Baldino, spokesman for the park. The only other way to access the town, besides the long, difficult hike, is by helicopter, he said.

The Ghost-Rider/Ghost Runner

No matter how far you fall, the ground will always catch you

Rocksurfer

  • Momentum Man
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 730
  • Male Posts: 13,860
  • Member since Jul '04
  • Lego Enforcement
    • View Profile
    • Spinnin4s 4x4 Club
http://www.thedesertsun.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061218/NEWS10/612180323/1050

Battle over a piece of heaven

Legal tug of war taking place over area near Death Valley
 
Gillian Flaccus
The Associated Press
December 18, 2006

BALLARAT - Whoever named Surprise Canyon got it right. Mere miles from bone-dry Death Valley, the canyon cradles two unexpected jewels: a gushing mountain stream and what's left of a once-bustling silver mining town.
These treasures have attracted visitors for decades - and now they're at the heart of a legal battle between off-road drivers and environmentalists.

Five years ago environmentalists successfully sued to get the narrow canyon and its spring-fed waterfalls closed to vehicles, arguing that the federal Bureau of Land Management was not carrying out its duty to protect the land.

In response, more than 80 off-roaders purchased tiny pockets of private land at the top of the canyon, and now they're suing the federal government for access to their property, arguing that the canyon is a public right of way.

It is one of several recent cases that could unlock thousands of miles of roads in federally protected parks around the West.

The fight over Surprise Canyon boils down to whether the rights of private property owners trump the protection of a fragile oasis on public land. The off-roaders have dusted off a Civil War-era mining law that places the public access rights of local governments and private individuals above the rights of the federal government.

Environmental groups allege that, before they won protection for the area in 2001, off-roaders destroyed the canyon by cutting trees, dumping boulders in the water and using winches to drag their Jeeps up the waterfalls. They are seeking to intervene in the off-roaders' lawsuit.

Since 2001, the canyon has regenerated, with new vegetation attracting wildlife.

"It's almost unbelievable what's up there. It's precious, it's pristine," said Tom Budlong, an activist who regularly hikes the canyon about 200 miles northeast of his Los Angeles home. "I shudder to think of the extreme four-wheelers getting back into the canyon and making a road where there is now no road."

Once there was a road - a 130-year-old gravel route that flash floods washed away nearly two decades ago. Off-roaders continued driving up the rugged canyon stream bed to reach the ghost town of Panamint City, which has easily explorable mine shafts, the remains of a smelter, some mine carts and a few cabins.
The canyon grows from an arid plain just north of the one-house desert outpost of Ballarat and climbs 3,700 feet over five miles to Panamint City, inside Death Valley National Park. Most of Surprise Canyon is outside the park boundary.

Flycatchers flit among thick stands of willows and cottonwood trees that crowd along the stream. Less common birds have been spotted since the area was closed to vehicles, notably the endangered Inyo California towhee, said Chris Kassar, an Arizona-based biologist with the Center for Biological Diversity. Other sensitive species such as the Panamint daisy and the Panamint alligator lizard also are flourishing, she said.

Kassar and others believe the canyon's ecosystem could crumble if the off-roaders prevail in their lawsuit, filed in August.

The off-roaders argue that, under an 1866 mining law, the canyon still is a public right of way even though the road is long gone.

"The issue is not off-roading and environmental issues. The legal issue is access," said plaintiffs' attorney Karen Budd-Falen. "If the road was once there and it's eroded out it's still a public access. The fact that it has been flooded out doesn't make the legal issue go away."

Similar arguments are being used in right-of-way lawsuits elsewhere in the West.

In 2004, San Juan County in Utah sued the National Park Service, claiming a creek in Canyonlands National Park was once a county road. Environmental groups have sought to intervene in that case, which is before the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Inyo County recently sued the same agency over four dirt roads in Death Valley National Park, and San Bernardino County sued over 14 roads in the Mojave National Preserve. Both suits allege the roads were county property before the federal government closed them.
« Last Edit: Dec 23, 2006, 09:01:16 PM by Rocksurfer »
The Ghost-Rider/Ghost Runner

No matter how far you fall, the ground will always catch you

 
 
 
 
 

Related Topics

0 Replies
951 Views
Last post Nov 14, 2005, 10:17:43 PM
by Panamint Charlie
2 Replies
2235 Views
Last post Apr 14, 2006, 01:22:24 PM
by BigMike
2 Replies
2741 Views
Last post Apr 15, 2006, 03:38:11 PM
by Rocksurfer
6 Replies
2515 Views
Last post Feb 28, 2008, 08:12:20 AM
by Rocksurfer
0 Replies
1415 Views
Last post Mar 29, 2012, 08:35:03 PM
by 46&2