Author Topic: 1983 pickup shackles  (Read 3355 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

blackdiamond

  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 1174
  • Male Posts: 5,058
  • Member since Dec '03
  • Crawlin with Marlin
    • View Profile
Re: 1983 pickup shackles
« on: Jul 09, 2015, 07:19:25 PM »
Do you want more flex in the front or rear? My 85 had a 3.5 inch Pro Comp with blocks in the rear and 32x11.50 tires. I went to 33x12.50 tires with a 4.5 Superlift with rear lift springs. The front springs flexed great in both scenarios and the rear did on with blocks and OEM springs. The rear has zero travel with the 4.5 arched rear springs.

Long shackles in the front rotates your differential down and can cause both bad driveline angles and steering geometry issues. Pickups don't flex well in the rear because they don't have much weight and it sounds like you shackle angle stinks.

You could try shorter shackles in the rear to match the front height and improve the shackle angle a bit.
1989 4Runner: Dual Ultimate (Inchworm front & Marlin 4.70 rear), Marlin Twin Stick, 1200-lb clutch, 4.88 R&P, Aussie Front, Detroit rear, 30-spline Longs, Long hub gears, ARP hub and knuckle studs & 35x12.50 Cooper STT PRO tires.  Marlin rear bumper & sliders.  FROR front bumper.  SAS with Alcan springs & Rancho 9000XL shocks.  Budbuilt Bolt-on traction bar.  Custom Interior Cage by Those Guys Rod and Customs.

Moab Tested & Rubicon Approved

 
 
 
 
 

Related Topics

8 Replies
2395 Views
Last post Jun 11, 2008, 07:09:49 PM
by Javey
5 Replies
2225 Views
Last post Jul 25, 2008, 09:24:45 PM
by solar86yota
7 Replies
3658 Views
Last post Nov 04, 2009, 09:07:35 PM
by kneedownnate
8 Replies
2234 Views
Last post May 08, 2011, 10:38:04 AM
by sparkys83yota
11 Replies
5700 Views
Last post Jun 24, 2011, 03:22:22 PM
by Zukied