Author Topic: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8  (Read 5028 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

furrballs95

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 124
  • Male Posts: 302
  • Member since Oct '05
  • boot scoot put in 4low and boogie
    • View Profile
22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« on: Nov 15, 2005, 02:18:46 PM »
i was wondering wat motor to put in my new projusect ruck its a 91 excab toyota its going to get a marlin SAS swap here soon but the motor is bad and i'm not shure wat to put in it :help:
95 Toyota p/u 3.0 v6. Marlin SAS with 5"springs, 30 spline bobby longs, and a welded V6 third in a trussed 85 front axle. 529's front and rear, Marlin rear kit with 5" springs, lockrite rear locker,  36"  IROCKS on 15x10 black rock crawlers, custom front and rear bumpers,

brainlessfool

  • It's not my problem if you can't hear the voices too.
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 2730
  • Male Posts: 4,207
  • Member since Jun '02
  • drive fast or the devil may get ya
    • View Profile
    • Buy me a cigar
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #1 on: Nov 15, 2005, 03:59:17 PM »
if your going to do a swap mite as well do the 2.7, other wise just run the 22RE. :twocents:
A good day working, that's just sick :reg:

Plowking

  • Offline Crawler Guru
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: -75
  • Male Posts: 504
  • Member since Jan '05
  • Awesome yota
    • View Profile
    • Buy me a drink
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #2 on: Nov 15, 2005, 06:58:06 PM »
Do your self a favor stay away from the 3.0 (3VZE) I put one in and nothing but headaches, and alot of cash. If you are gonna burn some cash the 3.4 is the way to go. I know locally they are reasonably chep 500 to 1200 . Lots of options and kits to make it work. Depends on your budget.
2008 Dodge Diesel  (Cummins Rule)
6.7 manual quad 8 foot bed H&S delete, banks air box
93 yota 3.0 locked up...
2004 Yamaha Raptor 660R

79coyotefrg

  • Rock Ninja
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 1452
  • Male Posts: 22,633
  • Member since May '02
  • Solid axle Toys Rule ! ! !
    • View Profile
    • HotSprings Superlift ORV park
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #3 on: Nov 15, 2005, 07:06:33 PM »
2.7  :bowdown:
AR-TTORA founder 22R bored.060,LCE stage II race cam http://pure-gas.org/    32/36weber, :driving: Marlin 1200 NON ceramic clutch, L52SHD+dualcase #2919, cable-locker, Yukon 5.29 gears, 35's, Allpro ebrake, front springs, and high steer, F150rears    RIP Nitro 9-29-07 :(  I sure miss him :down: MarlinCrawlerInc IS NOT affiliated with TrailGear in any way

furrballs95 [OP]

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 124
  • Male Posts: 302
  • Member since Oct '05
  • boot scoot put in 4low and boogie
    • View Profile
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #4 on: Nov 15, 2005, 08:30:08 PM »
my one buddy found out that the ax15 i think it is is the same tranny thats in his 90 yj and its the same in my 91 project and that all i would need to do is get the bell housing of a jeep 5spd and it will bolt to my tany and i could bolt up a 4.0 or build a 4.7 stroker wich i would really love to do so i'm really thinkin about putting a jeep motor. he built a 4.7 stroker and it is so sweet :beerchug:  :beerchug:
95 Toyota p/u 3.0 v6. Marlin SAS with 5"springs, 30 spline bobby longs, and a welded V6 third in a trussed 85 front axle. 529's front and rear, Marlin rear kit with 5" springs, lockrite rear locker,  36"  IROCKS on 15x10 black rock crawlers, custom front and rear bumpers,

furrballs95 [OP]

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 124
  • Male Posts: 302
  • Member since Oct '05
  • boot scoot put in 4low and boogie
    • View Profile
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #5 on: Nov 16, 2005, 07:20:10 PM »
well here is another thing i was thinkin about fdoing i have a 22r and my buddy has one tot hey both run great and iw as think of just building a nasty 22r. now i know that if you put the 20r head and and a bunch of other :pokinit: in it then you can make a pretty sweet motor but i ju st want something with alot of power but i dont want to put a v8 in it and i heard that the 4.0 i was too big for the toyota engine bay.  so if any have some sugestions let me kno thnx
95 Toyota p/u 3.0 v6. Marlin SAS with 5"springs, 30 spline bobby longs, and a welded V6 third in a trussed 85 front axle. 529's front and rear, Marlin rear kit with 5" springs, lockrite rear locker,  36"  IROCKS on 15x10 black rock crawlers, custom front and rear bumpers,

Crawler677

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: -43
  • Male Posts: 324
  • Member since Oct '05
  • BRRAaappp!
    • View Profile
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #6 on: Nov 17, 2005, 08:02:27 PM »
Do your self a favor stay away from the 3.0 (3VZE) I put one in and nothing but headaches, and alot of cash. If you are gonna burn some cash the 3.4 is the way to go. I know locally they are reasonably chep 500 to 1200 . Lots of options and kits to make it work. Depends on your budget.

:love:  :love:  :bowdown:  :clap:  :ha_ha:  :drooling:  my 3.4
'99 SR5/TRD Tacoma w/5vzfe. SAS'd with 64" diamond axle (w/ long superset & ARB). about 5" of lift, 305/75 x16 BFG KM1's. Soon to come: 1.5" more lift (6.5"), 35 to 37" tire, undecided at this point., 63" F/F diamond rear, Marlin 4.7 tacobox.

furrballs95 [OP]

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 124
  • Male Posts: 302
  • Member since Oct '05
  • boot scoot put in 4low and boogie
    • View Profile
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #7 on: Nov 18, 2005, 11:16:53 AM »
do any of you guys know if the 3.4 will bolt up to my v6 trany out of my 91 and how much will i lookin at on spending on one.
95 Toyota p/u 3.0 v6. Marlin SAS with 5"springs, 30 spline bobby longs, and a welded V6 third in a trussed 85 front axle. 529's front and rear, Marlin rear kit with 5" springs, lockrite rear locker,  36"  IROCKS on 15x10 black rock crawlers, custom front and rear bumpers,

KWP

  • Offline 4WD Legend
  • *****
  • Turtle Points: 1
  • Male Posts: 878
  • Member since Jul '04
  • Ghost Hunter
    • View Profile
    • East Central Oklahoma Paranormal Society
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #8 on: Nov 18, 2005, 07:50:30 PM »
  The v6 tranny you have now is a direct bolt on to the 3.4, don't really know about the engine prices though.
88 Toyota truck ( Under Construction ) Dana 60's front and rear 5.38's, welded diffs, 3inch Downey rears up front,one link rear with aerostar coils rolling on 39.5x16.50/17 Pittbull Rockers and 17x9 Pro Comp extreme alloys.http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=40816.0

Mac5005

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: -17
  • Male Posts: 307
  • Member since Oct '05
  • Black Listed
    • View Profile
    • NC4x4
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #9 on: Nov 28, 2005, 09:29:59 PM »
Well the 3.4 will bolt to your tranny, but you are going to have to cut a hole in the hood, b/c the intake plenum on the 3.4 is about 3" taller than that of the 3.0........sooooo in my opinion, i would rather cut a 6" wide piece of the firewall out, move it back 1.5"s, put it back together,drop in the 4.0L or the 4.7L  and no damage done to the exterior..., or if you take the bed off like you want to do, just mount the radiator and electric fan behind the cab, which will give you that lost clearance, and will also keep the radiator clear of limbs, and getting packed full of mud, and/or snow...ill call you tues night furrballs
« Last Edit: Nov 29, 2005, 07:57:04 AM by Mac5005 »
YJ - 4.7L-Ax15-D300(4:1)-D60/14B, lockright/spool 5.38's, 108" WB, 42" SX-2's

BigMike

  • Administrator
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 2124
  • Male Posts: 18,291
  • Member since Apr '02
  • 511:1 Club
    • View Profile
    • Bone-Stock Plane-Jane 1981 Shortbed Pickup
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #10 on: Nov 28, 2005, 10:42:50 PM »
the 3.0 should not even be discussed here.
Check out our new Rock Crawling Videos!
2016 56-speed 580:1 Tacoma Rock Crawler   
1981 36-speed 511:1 3RZ-FE Rock Crawler
1987 6-speed Supercharged 4A-GZE MR2
Instagram: @SlowestTacoma
Things are only impossible until they are not.
"The worst of both worlds, the best of neither." -abnormaltoy
"An informed question. But difficult to answer. I am what you see." -Nanaki

brainlessfool

  • It's not my problem if you can't hear the voices too.
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 2730
  • Male Posts: 4,207
  • Member since Jun '02
  • drive fast or the devil may get ya
    • View Profile
    • Buy me a cigar
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #11 on: Nov 29, 2005, 09:19:13 AM »
the 3.0 should not even be discussed here.

what he said.  :imwithstupid:
A good day working, that's just sick :reg:

hudlenutz

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 22
  • Male Posts: 220
  • Member since Apr '05
    • View Profile
    • My Page
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #12 on: Nov 29, 2005, 09:50:13 AM »
Since the truck was originally a 3.0, I'd definitely go 5VZ (3.4L).  The tranny and engine mounts match up.  You can actually trim the hood bracing, and fit the engine, but hood scoops look cool anyway.  I'd expect to pay $2000-$3000 to get the computer, harness, accessories, afm?, and other under-hood goodies (what's a coil pack?.. etc).  Check out the writeup at http://www.offroadsolutions.com.  I think it's under tech articles.  Also, there are multiple options to compress air for the 3.4, mainly the trd supercharger and the sts turbo kit.

HotSEXJ

  • Offline Rock Crawl'n
  • **
  • Turtle Points: -23
  • Male Posts: 22
  • Member since Sep '05
  • Women Want Me, Transmissions Fear Me
    • View Profile
1993 T100: #659, Ultra-Rare 4 Speed R150
1996 XJ: 98 Engine, Ultra-Rare 0 Speed AW4

KWP

  • Offline 4WD Legend
  • *****
  • Turtle Points: 1
  • Male Posts: 878
  • Member since Jul '04
  • Ghost Hunter
    • View Profile
    • East Central Oklahoma Paranormal Society
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #14 on: Dec 01, 2005, 06:12:17 PM »
 :whythis: :stopit:
88 Toyota truck ( Under Construction ) Dana 60's front and rear 5.38's, welded diffs, 3inch Downey rears up front,one link rear with aerostar coils rolling on 39.5x16.50/17 Pittbull Rockers and 17x9 Pro Comp extreme alloys.http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=40816.0

furrballs95 [OP]

  • Offline Rock Master
  • ***
  • Turtle Points: 124
  • Male Posts: 302
  • Member since Oct '05
  • boot scoot put in 4low and boogie
    • View Profile
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #15 on: Dec 04, 2005, 05:31:38 PM »
A Jeep 4.0L will fit in a Yota.

http://jeepin.net/forum/showthread.php?t=20750&highlight=xota


i really am not lookin into doing all of that work i want to keep my toyota SAS that guy put alot of time and money into that thing but it really sweet if i had the time i would do it but i dont
95 Toyota p/u 3.0 v6. Marlin SAS with 5"springs, 30 spline bobby longs, and a welded V6 third in a trussed 85 front axle. 529's front and rear, Marlin rear kit with 5" springs, lockrite rear locker,  36"  IROCKS on 15x10 black rock crawlers, custom front and rear bumpers,

BigMike

  • Administrator
  • Offline Gold Turtle Award
  • *
  • Turtle Points: 2124
  • Male Posts: 18,291
  • Member since Apr '02
  • 511:1 Club
    • View Profile
    • Bone-Stock Plane-Jane 1981 Shortbed Pickup
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #16 on: Dec 05, 2005, 12:00:57 AM »
I would say to go with the 3.4 since most everything will bolt right up to it. Same tranny, same engine mounts
Check out our new Rock Crawling Videos!
2016 56-speed 580:1 Tacoma Rock Crawler   
1981 36-speed 511:1 3RZ-FE Rock Crawler
1987 6-speed Supercharged 4A-GZE MR2
Instagram: @SlowestTacoma
Things are only impossible until they are not.
"The worst of both worlds, the best of neither." -abnormaltoy
"An informed question. But difficult to answer. I am what you see." -Nanaki

Stinky

  • Offline Crawler Guru
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: 8
  • Male Posts: 636
  • Member since Aug '05
  • my wifes vagine, it hangs like a sleeve of wizard
    • View Profile
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #17 on: Jan 29, 2006, 06:32:51 PM »
that toy on jeepin has the hep front clip so that he would have room for everything w/ out cutting the truck up...yet he cut the WHOLE damn front clip off.....stupd ppl..yet it IS pretty damn cool....the hell w/ that put a honda motor in it n call it quits...there BILLIONS UPON BILLIONS of things for honda motors...plus vtec sounds sick.....or be cool, keep it toyota, and build a 22re...it takes some expertice n know-how of motors to do...but a 22re revving to 6000 and PULLING at 6000...in my perspective is pretty damn sick...BYE
87 p/u SAS, 22RE, built, then cut up and scrapped

94 ex cab P/U, SR5, fully loaded, 3.4 swap, r150f, a/c, bumpers, 33s, glass fenders...sold

00 Stoopid Duty 250, ex cab, lariat, v-10,000

94 reg cab, 22re, duals, 38.5 boggers, sas, 4 link, tube bed, build underway... http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=967836

88 Samurai, soa, buick 3.8, th350, zuki case, 1/4 done... anyone wanna buy it??

yotaboy79

  • stuck in the shop
  • Offline The 2.5K Group
  • ****
  • Turtle Points: -19
  • Male Posts: 2,838
  • Member since Aug '03
    • View Profile
Re: 22r or re vs. 2.7 or 3.0 vs the 3.4 or a V8
« Reply #18 on: Jan 29, 2006, 06:43:30 PM »
or build a 20/22r hybrid running on propane thats what im starting to think about instead of dealing with the wiring of swaping an efi motor in